Page 150 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 150

344
                 floated the idea,  substantially about equality of arms and of definition that
                 means that the least able to cope for themselves must be as empowered as the
                 best resourced. A service like the HDS - inquisitorial rather than adversarial,
                 conscious that tenants will often be vulnerable, trained to identify and assist
                 the vulnerable, unconstrained by what are in the real world artificial legal
                 characteristics, charged to seek out the real causes of disputes and achieve
                 solutions which address underlying problems, with a duty to protect parties
                 and wherever possible to keep people in their homes - offers much more than
                 a solicitor, Law Centre or advice agency, reeling from austerity and its cuts
                          345
                 to legal aid  and untrained and unresourced in many of the underlying issues,
                       346
                 can do.

             7.  This is not to criticise the services that solicitors, Law Centres and advice
                 agencies  provide,  but to  recognise  the  reality  that  for  many  tenants  many
                 housing problems are not confined to the legal issues and that most vulnerable
                 people are not concerned about legal victories but want long-term resolution
                 of their problems and long-term provision of their needs. The HLPA Dissent
                 asserts that their members and the system, including judges, recognise and
                 inquire  into  underlying  problems,  illustrating  disrepair,  mental  health  and
                 benefits, but it does not say what is done about them, failing to recognise that
                 the  HDS  is  intended  to  take  an  active  approach  to  resolve  problems,
                 employing skills with which to do so, a role that the Dissent has not, I think,
                                                         347
                 comprehended (see in particular its para. 32).

          they and many in the profession were much more sympathetic, than the protective legislation comprised
          in Rent Acts and Housing Acts.

          344  Housing Dispute Resolution [2019] JHL 39; Housing Rights and Wrongs - The Beat Goes On [2019]
          J.H.L. 79.

          345  Even if legal aid is liberalised, limits will inevitably remain and in any event, the private sector will
          not enjoy the powers to effect resolutions that the HDS is intended to exercise, see, e.g., Report, para.
          2.51.

          346  Law Centres - if properly funded - do often have a non-lawyer resource on staff. Much of my own
          concern about the adversarial system was formed early in my career by two years at Small Heath Law
          Centre in Birmingham, where the professional staff included a non-lawyer and a collaborative - and
          inquisitorial  -  approach  was  instilled  between  the  Law  Centre  and  the  local  authority  towards  the
          resolution of problems without recourse to litigation.

          347  A court cannot order a benefits reassessment or back-dating; the County Court in a housing case
          cannot order a Care Act 2014 assessment or similar. Whilst it is undoubtedly true that many District
          Judges and tenant lawyers will use pressure (including disclosure orders) to try to resolve welfare benefits
                                                                                 144
   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155