Page 80 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 80

3.45 The  implications  of  a  failure  to  engage  in  ADR  arises  at  the  conclusion  of
              litigation  at  the  costs  assessment  stage.  Arguably,  this  is  too  late.  The  Civil
              Justice Council has suggested that there could be a form of interim sanction
              available to express disapproval of a refusal or failure to mediate by parties at
                             217
              the interim stage.  The intention is to influence parties’ behaviour earlier in the
              litigation process, to encourage engagement in ADR as early as possible. We
              agree with this proposal, subject to the caveat that sanctions at an interim stage
              can only be introduced if pre-action ADR is meaningful and practical obstacles
              to engagement, which we have outlined above, are removed. Specialist providers
              must be widely available and accessible, it must be more prominently positioned
              in the dispute resolution process, and publicly funded advice and representation
              should  be  available.  We  recommend  that,  subject  to  there  being  an
              appropriate level of funding for ADR providers and practitioners at the pre-
              action stage, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee should consider whether
              costs  sanctions  for  failure  to  engage  with  ADR  pre-action  ought  to  be
              introduced earlier in the case management process.

          ADR in the court and tribunal process

          3.46 Procedural processes within the courts and tribunals contain certain “nudges” or
              encouragement  towards  ADR.  The  FTT  (PC)  sends  out  mediation  flyers  to
              parties early in the process, and after an initial case management hearing, case
                                                                218
              officers send out a lengthier “agreement to mediate form”.  Early in the conduct
              of  housing  disputes  in  the  courts,  parties  are  sent  a directions  questionnaire,
              which asks an array of questions relevant for case management.
                                                                      219

          217  Ibid Civil Justice Council para 8.33-8.36.

          218  The flyers explain the advantages of mediation under various sub-headings; “cost-effective”, “quick”,
          “private”, “win/win”, “positive relationships”. The agreement to mediate forms explains the benefits of
          mediation, and how it works in the tribunal, before offering parties a tick box, to express whether they
          want to participate in mediation or not.  If the parties accept, mediation is offered by the FTT (PC) itself,
          as opposed to by an external provider.

          219  The directions questionnaire sent depends on which “track” the case is in, which is governed by
          damages claimed. Claims under £10,000 are sent the small claims directions questionnaire, the N180
          form, available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachm
          ent_data/file/856374/n180-eng.pdf  Fast  and  multi-track  claims  are  sent  the  N181  form,  available  at
          https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/8563
          74/n180-eng.pdf  Questions are  included  regarding compliance  with the relevant  pre-action  protocol,
          endeavours to settle, experts needed and case management arrangements.

                                                                                  74
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85