Page 51 - When Things Go Wrong
P. 51

3.12  Quite apart from the adversarial manner adopted by certain investigators 133  and
               advocates (which we consider in Chapter V, paras 5.6-5.10), evidence from
               our consultees suggests that the experience of repeating evidence to several
               agencies is in itself “distressing, exhausting and deeply inefficient”. One
                                                                                  134
               consultee described the process for bereaved families as a “war of attrition”.

         3.13  Patronising Disposition recognised that “in some instances there may be an
               immediate need to conduct interviews with bereaved families – for example,
               to prevent further  loss of  life, or  in cases where for other reasons  it is
               operationally necessary”. 135   However, Jones  stressed  “the need  for the
               bereaved family and friends of those who have died to be questioned only as
               absolutely necessary”. 136  The Working Party supports this view. It is crucial
               that  the justice system addresses the potentially re-traumatising effect of
               reliving near-death experiences, or the death of loved ones through several
               rounds of questioning.

         3.14  Recognising existing efforts to encourage coordination, we recommend that
               where possible,  investigating agencies collaborate in the questioning of
               witnesses. A lead interviewer should aim to gather evidence that can
               satisfy the objectives of multiple investigations and form part of a cross-
               jurisdictional dossier.  Investigating  agencies  should  meet  with  a view  to
               appointing  interviewers and briefing them as to  the issues on which
               information is sought.









         133  See Angiolini supra note 15, para 15.10: “Families cite examples of the police and IPCC questioning
         them about the lifestyle of the deceased, and incorrect details, false narratives and ‘victim blaming’
         about their loved ones”.
         134  See also ‘INQUEST report of the Family Listening Day held to support the Rt Rev Bishop James
         Jones’ Review of the Hillsborough Families’ Experiences’, April 2017 and ‘INQUEST report of the
         Family Listening Days held to support the independent review into deaths and serious incidents in police
         custody’, May 2017.
         135  Jones, supra note 16, p. 33.
         136  Ibid.
                                                                                  44
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56