Page 68 - When Things Go Wrong
P. 68

4.15  CEDR has recommended, “ideally the selection of an Inquiry Chair should be
               an open process whereby both those involved in the selection and the wider
               public can see how the selection was made; what the criteria were and why the
               person was considered suitable. As far as possible,  ad hoc procedures or
               selection should be avoided”. 186   The CEDR report proposes a structured
               approach to selection exercises, which  includes shortlisting of candidates
               “from a relatively small pool of potential appointees” and “ensuring appointees
               have no perceived conflicts of interest or experiences/affiliations which might
               subsequently case doubt on their impartiality and independence”.   187
               Appointees would be assessed against set criteria.

         4.16  Building on CEDR’s proposal, we recommend that on the establishment of
               public inquiries, Government should be advised on the appointment of
               inquiry chairs and panellists by the Independent Advisory Board to the
               Central Inquiries Unit (see paras 2.13-2.14). The Board should make its
               nominations with reference to clear, publicly accessible criteria, taking
               into account diversity of  representation.  The results and details of
               nomination exercises should be made public so far as possible. In order that
               the Section 9 requirement for the panellists themselves to be “impartial” is not
               compromised, those  Board members involved in the shortlisting exercise
               “should be...those who can be readily perceived as being independent and
               separate from those involved in the [inquiry] process to show impartiality”. 188

         4.17  The Board’s role would be advisory, but greater consultation can only improve
               the current system. Assisting Ministers  through  the  provision of expertly
               compiled shortlists will enhance legitimacy and promote appropriately diverse
               inquiry tribunals.


         Setting the terms of reference

         4.18  Setting the parameters of any inquiry  is of fundamental importance. In
               evidence to the PASC, the Government submitted that the “terms of reference

         186  Mackie and Way, supra note 40, p. 14.
         187  Ibid.

         188  Ibid.
         61
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73