Page 103 - Reforming Benefits Decision-Making
P. 103

287
               UC  payments  to  be  stopped  or  reduced.   As  discussed  in  Chapter  2,
               evidence also suggests that claimants aren’t aware of the easements they may
                            288
               be  entitled  to.   It  is  crucial  that  claimants  are  fully  aware  of  what  their
               obligations are and what actions may cause them to be sanctioned. Consultees
               raised concerns that claimants who do not speak good English or are illiterate,
               are not able to properly understand their claimant commitment and therefore
               their obligations and the circumstances in which they may be sanctioned. The
                                                                       289
               same is also true of some claimants with learning disabilities  and mental
                               290
               health conditions.
          4.10  We  recommended  in  Chapter  2  that  work  coaches  should  do  more  to
               understand claimants’ circumstances and apply appropriate easements. Whilst
               it should be the work coaches’ responsibility to proactively seek to understand
               claimants’ circumstances and apply any easements that may be applicable, we
               understand  that  this  may  not  happen  in  all  cases.  Claimants  should  be
               provided with information  on  the  different types of  easements that  are
               available. This will enable claimants to understand that an easement may be
               available and enable them to ask for it to be applied where their work coach
               does not do so.

          On how to challenge a decision

          4.11  As discussed in Chapter 3, claimants often have difficulty understanding that
               there is a two-stage process to challenge a benefits decision. This is one of the
               reasons we have recommended the removal of the mandatory reconsideration
               stage of the process. However, whilst it remains in place,  the current two
               stage process for challenging benefits decisions should be better explained

          287   Government  Social  Research  and  the  DWP,  Universal  Credit  Full  Service  Omnibus  Survey:
          Findings  from  two  waves  of  tracking  research  with  recent  Universal  Credit  full  service  claimants
          (2019) p.26. See also G. McKeever, M. Simpson and C. Fitzpatrick, Destitution and Paths to Justice
          (see n. 3 above) - claimants in their sample did not understand why or when a sanction had resulted,
          p.44
          288   Work  and  Pensions  Committee,  Benefits  Sanctions  (see  n.  11  above)  para  93;  SSAC,  The
          effectiveness of the claimant commitment in Universal Credit (see n. 12 above) p.30.
          289  SSAC, The effectiveness of the claimant commitment in Universal Credit (see n. 12 above) p.30.
          290  N. Bond et al., The Benefits Assault Course (see n. 50 above) p.30.


                                                                                  94
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108