Page 85 - Reforming Benefits Decision-Making -(updated - August 2021)
P. 85

e)  The DWP makes some claimants go through a ‘problem-solving’ stage
                   before they can submit a request for mandatory reconsideration. Whilst
                   the aim of this is well intentioned – to reduce a backlog of mandatory
                   reconsideration requests - it creates a two-tier system that is not set out in
                   law and can result in further delays to the appeals process.

          3.19  The DWP told us that none of these problems should be happening. However,
               this serves to further highlight  the issue discussed in  Chapter 2  –  the
               disconnect between policy and practice and demonstrates the need for more
               robust monitoring and quality assurance processes.

          3.20  For those wishing to dispute a calculation of earnings, which are provided to
               DWP  by  HMRC’s  ‘real time information’  (RTI) system, there is  a further
               stage in the redress process. A change to a claimant’s UC award resulting
               from  a change of RTI information does  not constitute a decision of the
               Secretary of State.   In order to obtain a decision, which can  then be
                                 235
               challenged by way of  mandatory  reconsideration  and appeal, the claimant
               must first dispute the employed earnings figure and request the Secretary of
               State to give a decision in relation to the amount of UC payable.  As with
                                                                          236
               mandatory reconsideration, there are examples of claimants disputes not being
               progressed because they are not in the ‘correct’ format. Further, the DWP’s
               guidance  on  RTI  disputes  suggests that  where  the  earnings  are  correct  no
                                     237
               dispute should be raised.  However, the regulations provide a clear right to a
               decision, which  is  technically required before a  mandatory reconsideration
               can be requested.

          3.21  Further, the additional administrative hurdle of mandatory reconsideration can
               cause claimant confusion. Working Party members and consultees told us that
               claimants often do  not understand that there is  a two-stage  process to
               challenge a decision. We were also told it causes claimant fatigue; claimants


          235   s.159D(1)(b)(vi) and (2) Social Security Administration Act  1992; Universal Credit, Personal
          Independence Payment, Jobseeker's Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Decisions
          and Appeals) Regulations 2013/381, reg 41(1).
          236   The Universal Credit, Personal Independence Payment, Jobseeker's Allowance and Employment
          and Support Allowance (Decisions and Appeals) Regulations 2013/381, reg 41(3).
          237  DWP, ‘Real Time Information’ Universal Credit Guidance, (October 2020).


                                                                                  76
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90