Page 113 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 113

4.30 We recommend the HCRS has within it quality housing advice providers
              accessible through various means. There should be a prominent section on
              the HCRS portal with a list of housing providers, signposted to users as they
              fill out structured questions. Alternatively, an advice platform should be
              accessible from the HCRS landing page.
          Case workers and cross-referral

          4.31 Finally,  a  key  feature  of  our  proposed  HCRS  is  a  well-defined  role  for
              “authorised court and tribunal staff” and for those staff and equivalents in redress
              schemes to offer procedural assistance, signposting to advice providers and the
              capacity to refer disputes to alternative pathways where needed. Some of these
              functions are already carried out by HMCTS administrative case officers; for
              example in the FTT (PC), where the current “cradle-to-grave” case management
              system provides users with a named individual officer responsible for their case.
              This  officer  servers  as  their  main  point  of  contact  and  can  give  advice  and
                                                                               323
              explanations about tribunal procedure throughout the lifetime of the case.

                                                                         324
          4.32 JUSTICE’s 2015 report, Delivering Justice in an Age of Austerity  and Lord
                                                      325
              Justice Briggs’ Civil Courts Structure Review  recommended an expanded and
              assistive role for court and tribunal staff in civil disputes through the devolution
              of procedural functions ordinarily reserved for judges.  The Courts and Tribunals
              (Judiciary and Functions of Staff) Act 2018 gives effect to this aspiration, by
              allowing “authorised court and tribunal staff to exercise judicial functions where
                                       326
              procedure rules so provide”.  The precise procedural functions exercisable are
              at the discretion of jurisdiction-specific rules committees, though the general





          323  One of the key criticisms we received from housing lawyers was that widespread retrenchments in
          court staff meant it was often impossible to contact a staff member for rudimentary case management
          issues.

          324   JUSTICE  (2015),  Delivering  Justice  in  an  Age  of  Austerity,  available  at  available  at
          http://2bquk8cdew6192tsu41lay8t.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/JUSTICE-
          working-party-report-Delivering-Justice-in-an-Age-of-Austerity.pdf

          325  Briggs, note 160.

          326  Section 3.

          107
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118