Page 115 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 115

“authorised  tribunal  staff”  to  conduct  an  array  of  procedural  functions
                                             328
              historically  the  fiefdom  of  judges   but  as  yet,  authorised  court  staff  in  the
              County  Court  have  not  been  delegated  procedural  functions through  practice
              statement. Our proposal for the HCRS will require procedural functions to be
              delegated to County Court staff. To give effect to the triage function of case
              workers under the HCRS, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee should bring
              forward consideration as to what procedural functions “authorised court
              staff” should exercise within the County Court.

          4.35 Further, we recommend that those staff should be able to assess whether the
              person’s  dispute  is  within  jurisdiction  and,  if  need  be,  to  refer  disputes
              which are, in fact, maladministration claims to housing redress schemes,
                              329
              and  vice  versa.   Currently,  the  Housing  Ombudsman  and  the  Local
              Government  &  Social  Care  Ombudsman,  which  have  split  jurisdictions
              regarding  complaints  about  local  authority  housing  functions,  have  a
              Memorandum of Understanding to deal with disputes which have been brought
              to  the  wrong  body,  queries  about  whose  jurisdiction  applies  and  complaints
                                                                      330
              where there are separate issues which engage both jurisdictions.  Similar cross-
              referring arrangements will be needed for the HCRS. Various redress providers
              operating within the HCRS should, to the extent practicable, look to standardise
              the front end, assistive role carried out by case handlers. The Redress Reform
              Working Group provides an opportunity to do so, and it may be that the body we
              propose at paragraph 4.12 could assist in that regard.

          4.36 The  Redress  Reform  Working  Group  should  work  collaboratively  to
              establish  universal  coverage  of  housing  complaints,  by  making
              arrangements for all jurisdictions to be capable of cross-referring disputes
              to each other, recommending rule changes where necessary, and devolving
              functions to court and tribunal staff to facilitate such referrals.


          328  Ibid.

          329  On this, see Sir Ernest Ryder, ‘Driving improvements: collaboration and peer learning; Ombudsman
          Association  conference’  (Belfast,  21  May  2019)  p.  3  available  at  https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-
          content/uploads/2019/09/2019_09_19_SPT_Ombudsman_Conference_-Belfast_May2019_FINAL-
          2.pdf

          330  Available   at   https://www.housing-ombudsman.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/lgsco-hos-
          mou.pdf

          109
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120