Page 132 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 132

VIII.  Annexure B: Dissenting report of the Housing
                    Law Practitioners Association members of the
                    Working Party


          Introduction
             1.  This dissenting report addresses Chapter 2 of the Solving Housing Disputes
                 report,  which  proposes  the  establishment  of  a  Housing  Disputes  Service
                 (HDS), before briefly addressing Chapter 4. It is produced by the members of
                 the Working Party from the Housing Law Practitioners’ Association (HLPA)
                 and is supported by Professor Helen Carr, another member of the Working
                      331
                 Party.

             2.  In  summary,  we  consider  that  the  HDS  is  a  fundamentally  misconceived
                 proposition which is wrong in principle and unworkable in practice.  To the
                 best of our knowledge, it is not supported by a single tenant/homeless persons
                 solicitors’ firm, organisation, charity, or law centre.  It does not understand or
                 reflect the realities of representing vulnerable people with housing problems.
                 It fails to grapple with the inherent imbalance of power in the landlord/tenant
                 and  local  authority/homeless  person  relationship.    It  would,  in  our  view,
                 breach Article 6 ECHR.  It represents not a levelling of the playing field but
                 a race to the bottom.

          Underlying principles
             3.  The principles underlying HLPA’s consideration of the HDS proposal are as
                 follows:

                 (a)  The availability and adequacy of housing is of fundamental importance
                    to occupiers. Accordingly, any consideration of the HDS proposal must
                    start  from  the  principle  of  non-retrogression  in  the  protection  of
                    occupiers’ rights: current inequalities between litigants must be “levelled
                                                 332
                    up” rather than “levelled down”.

          331  It draws upon views expressed to us by other members of HLPA, including by email, in person, and
          at a meeting for HLPA members in December 2019 convened for the purposes of considering the HDS
          proposal, at which opposition to the proposal was unanimous.

          332  See Articles 2(1) and 11(1) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,
          General Comment No. 4: The Right to Adequate Housing and the UN OHCHR Factsheet 21 on The
          Right to Adequate Housing.
                                                                                 126
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137