Page 70 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 70

180
              providing  the  possibility  of  flexible  and  imaginative  solutions.   Pre-action
                                               181
              processes for certain housing claims  encourage parties to pursue ADR and
              negotiate prior to commencing a claim. Court and tribunal judges are encouraged
              to facilitate ADR and costs consequences flow from an unreasonable refusal to
                             182
              engage  in  ADR.   Various  ombudsmen  schemes  have  a  significant  role  in
              maladministration  claims  and  other  complaints  against  housing  providers,
              investigating, advising and adjudicating a significant and increasing number of
              cases per year. 183  Finally disputes relating to the repayment of tenancy deposits
              are all handled online by one of three tenancy deposit protection schemes.

          3.27 Notwithstanding  its  expansion  across  the  justice  system  and  agreed  benefits,
                                                                                  184
              uptake of ADR at all stages of housing disputes remains unreasonably low.
              This section of the report explores how that might be changed. It takes a broad
              view of ADR, as including negotiation, mediation and early neutral evaluation.
              Quite some time is spent on consideration of pre-action ADR, engagement and
              negotiation, which is where a huge amount of work is currently done.





          180  Beyond what the courts might be capable of achieving, see Dunnett v Railtrack PL [2002] EWCA
          Civ 303.

          181  Both part 2.10 of the Pre-Action Protocol for Possession Claims by Social Landlords and part 4.1 of
          the Pre-action protocol for housing disrepair cases provides that “the parties should consider whether it
          is possible to resolve the issues between them by discussion and negotiation without recourse to litigation.
          The parties may be required by the court to provide evidence that alternative means of resolving the
          dispute were considered. Courts take the view that litigation should be a last resort, and that claims should
          not be issued prematurely when a settlement is still actively being explored”.

          182  CPR 44.3(2) provides the general rule that the unsuccessful party should pay the costs of the successful
          party, but rule 44.3(5) qualifies this, allowing costs to be varied, based on the behaviour of the parties
          both before and during the proceedings.

          183   There  are  several schemes  which exist  within the landscape, described in  chapter 4.  By  way  of
          illustration of volume, in 2018 the Property Ombudsman took 29,023 customer enquiries (22% increase
          on 2017), for which the scheme gave advice, signposted, provided local or early resolution on, and made
          4,246 adjudications (up 16% on 2017), The Property Ombudsman, ‘Annual Report 2018’, available at
          https://www.tpos.co.uk/images/documents/annual-reports/2018-annual-report.pdf

          184  At the London regional training day for the FTT (PC) in 2019 we were told that 89 cases had been
          listed for mediation in 2019, with a 73.8% success rate, but that figure represented only 4% of the total
          number of Property Chamber cases.

                                                                                  64
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75