Page 34 - JUSTICE Tackling Racial Injustice - Children and the Youth Justice System
P. 34

apply when making a stop and that the PACE Codes and policing guidance are
               often ignored. Although PACE explicitly states that a “hunch or instinct which
               cannot be explained or justified to an objective observer can never amount to
                                  90
               reasonable grounds”,  it is hard to tell the difference between a ground such
               as “avoiding eye contact” and a hunch. We support calls for the PACE Codes
               to be amended to clarify what a genuine suspicion entails, including that
               the smell of cannabis alone cannot be grounds for suspicion.

         2.27  Where there is a positive finding, particularly if drugs are found, there are
               worse outcomes for BAME people – specifically Black people – than White
               people. Following a stop for drugs, Black people are more likely than White
               people to be arrested and convicted of cannabis possession. Moreover, Black
               people are more likely to be convicted for cannabis possession than for the
               supply of class A and class B drugs combined,  showing stop and search does
                                                        91
               not primarily target gangs or the drivers of serious violence.

         2.28  While analysis of the UK’s drug policy is outside the scope of this report, we
               consider that divergent ways in which White and Black people are treated
               when drugs are found signals the need for a different approach. At present, we
               understand that there is an expectation that police officers must charge if they
               find  drugs  on  an  individual  who  has  three  previous  cautions.  However,
               reducing the number of children charged for simple cannabis possession, and
               instead identifying and ensuring their welfare needs, would have a significant,
               positive impact in reducing racial disparity in the youth justice system. In any
               event, should drugs be found, particularly those of a higher classification, it
               seems to us that a “child first” approach should recognise this as abnormal
               behaviour for any child and prioritise safeguarding above punishment. Police
               officers should always prioritise the welfare of the child (such as utilising
               diversion  and  deferred-prosecution schemes)  over punitive responses
               through the YJS.




         relevant to the likelihood that the object in question will be found - PACE Codes of Practice, Code A
         2:2.
         90  PACE Codes of Practice, Code A, para 2.6B.
         91  M. Shiner, Z Carre, R. Delsol and Niamh Eastwood, The Colour of Injustice: ‘Race’, drugs and law
         enforcement in England and Wales, (StopWatch, Release and IDPU, 2018),p. 42.


         27
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39