Page 44 - JUSTICE Tackling Racial Injustice - Children and the Youth Justice System
P. 44

addition to outcomes that  limit an individual’s (and their family’s)
               opportunities, inclusion on the GVM can also contribute to worse criminal
               justice consequences. This has been relied on as evidence in bail applications
               and in joint enterprise prosecutions, to substantiate gang membership – despite
               the fact that an individual’s inclusion may be a result of their status as a victim
               of serious violence, and not as a result of prior convictions. 128  Many of these
               issues are well known, even to the MPS, and we note that in 2020 the GVM
               underwent an overhaul at the initiative of the Mayor of London, which resulted
               in a 31% reduction in the number of names listed. 129  This was followed by
               further reductions in February 2021. 130

         2.43  Nevertheless,  we are deeply concerned by the use of  the  GVM, as  an
               intelligence tool and source of evidence in courts. We are not convinced that
               the  alleged  policing  benefits  outweigh  the  manifest  disproportionate  and
               negative effect it has on  BAME communities.  The  GVM  exacerbates
               perceptions of children, especially BAME children, as sophisticated criminals
               rather than vulnerable individuals. We therefore recommend that the GVM
               should be abolished.

         2.44  Until this is achieved, we consider that the GVM should primarily serve as
               a  safeguarding tool, with respect to children, young,  and vulnerable
               adults. If BAME children associated with gangs are not identified as at risk as
               early as possible,  they  will  lose  visibility  of whether they are victims or
               perpetrators, and are unlikely to seek help when they need it. Our proposal
               would mean that, where an individual is identified as being at risk of
               participating in gang activities, a multi-agency safeguarding response is
               implemented as quickly as possible. It should under no circumstances be used
               to reduce a child’s life chances, for instance by causing school exclusion. For
               example, when a child comes to Young Hackney with gang associations, it
               seeks to frame the discussion around peer influence and what the child gets out
               of  those relationships, rather than talking about gangs. Northamptonshire
               Youth Offending Service (YOS) also have a similar mindset and have set up a


         128  D. Lammy, ‘Speech to London Councils’, 2016.
         129  The Matrix has been the subject of reports from the Information Commissioner’s Office and the
         Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime in London, both of which highlight biases within it. As a result
         of these reports, a large number of low-risk individuals have been removed from the GVM. However,
         large disparities remain. See ‘Mayor’s intervention results in overhaul of Met's Gangs Matrix’ Mayor
         of London, 16 February 2020.
         130  V. Dodd, ‘A thousand young, black men removed from Met gang violence prediction database’ The
         Guardian, 3 February 2021.


         37
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49