Page 72 - JUSTICE Tackling Racial Injustice - Children and the Youth Justice System
P. 72

vi.  the requirement to charge a child only in the presence of their solicitor or
                   legal advisor, as well as a prohibition on the  use of requisitions for
                   children.
               vii.  no requirement to admit guilt in order to be considered for diversion.
               viii. a statutory requirement, with associated  funding, for YOTs to provide
                   informal diversion through individualised interventions and, if completed,
                   the police take no further action. 206
               ix.  a mechanism for the police to re-refer to a diversion panel when further
                   information becomes available.
               x.  a continuous reassessment of whether diversion is appropriate throughout
                   the legal process.

         3.35  In order for the national framework to be effective, it must be monitored
               properly. This means that data gathering on diversion – and all out of court
               disposals – must improve. As such, we support the recommendations of the
               Justice Select Committee that the MoJ and YJB work together to collect
               accurate and consistent data on the impact and effectiveness of out of
               court disposals.


         3.36  In addition, to strengthen the principle that arrest should be used as a last resort,
               restorative justice as an out of court disposal should be considered more often,
               especially for BAME children. Used mainly for more minor crimes, this allows
               children to avoid criminal prosecution if they apologise and make a form of
               reparation. 207  In general, use of this disposal has been declining, with there
               being racial disparities as to who receives it. Greater transparency and
               monitoring is required to better understand this trend.

         3.37  We are satisfied that consistent diversion schemes based on this framework
               will mean more BAME children are diverted. In addition, we consider that our
               proposed national framework would deliver cost saving in the long term, as the
               Justice Committee has also identified. This is because criminal justice
               agencies, such as YOTs, would deal with fewer children. In addition, diversion
               schemes would lead to reductions in reoffending, which also reduce costs to



         206  This is currently available in many areas, in most London YOTs it is called ‘triage’, in other areas it
         may be described in different ways such as youth restorative diversion or youth restorative intervention.
         207  See, for example, s.73 and s.74 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000


         65
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77