Page 69 - JUSTICE Tackling Racial Injustice - Children and the Youth Justice System
P. 69

not complete  the relevant course for reasons related to their lifestyle.
               Regardless of causes, the consequences are clear. The differential access to
               diversion means White children are more likely  to be the beneficiaries of
               interventions that are more likely to stop repeat offending. The lamentable
               waste in opportunity is evidenced by the fact that most children held on remand
               do not receive a custodial sentence.

         3.30  We consider the use of diversion to  be essential  in mitigating disparate
               outcomes for BAME children. 198  For instance, participants in the DIVERT
               programme in Brixton have a reoffending rate of 7%, 199  and the scheme at
               Young Hackney also has excellent initial results 200  – although it is awaiting the
               results of a formal evaluation. In the United States, the Philadelphia Police
               School Diversion has been running since 2014, and has been  replicated
               throughout the country. It has resulted in a 54% reduction in arrests at school
               and 75% reduction in the number of expulsions from school. This shows that
               diversion not only reduces reoffending but can improve many different
               outcomes for children. 201


         3.31  Despite these excellent results, access to diversion remains a post code lottery.
               This is because there is no national framework; each area has a different way
               of doing it, if indeed it does it all. This can mean that some areas require an
                                                                                  202
               admission of guilt to be considered for diversion, while others do not.
               Moreover, some areas do not have programmes at all, or where they exist they
               are either ineffective or culturally inappropriate. This differing practice means




         198  Diversion is a process where those who are arrested are not dealt with through traditional criminal
         justice mechanisms. Rather, they are ‘diverted’ to less formal programmes that seek to address the root
         causes of the behaviour that led to arrest. In this way, the individual should be less likely to reoffend.
         Although  relatively recent developments, initial  indicators  are  that diversion schemes are highly
         effective at turning people away from crime.
         199  DIVERT, ‘DIVERT briefing note’, 2018.
         200  Centre for Justice Innovation, ‘Understanding Youth Diversion in London Evidence and practice
         briefing’ June 2020.
         201  Philadelphia Police School Diversion Programme, Keeping kids in school and out of court, 2018.
         202  See, for example, the ‘CPS Director’s Guidance on Charging (6th Edition)’ at para 8.9: “A caution
         or conditional caution will require that the person admits guilt. This is in addition to the requirement
         that the evidential stage of the Code test is met. More informal resolutions require that responsibility
         is acknowledged.”.


                                                                                  62
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74