Page 15 - Reforming Benefits Decision-Making
P. 15

I. INTRODUCTION

          “many aspects of the design and rollout of [Universal Credit] have suggested that
          the Department for Work and Pensions is more concerned with making economic
          savings and sending messages about lifestyles than responding to the multiple needs
          of  those  living  with  a  disability,  job  loss,  housing  insecurity,  illness,  and  the
                              1
          demands of parenting.”
          Background

          1.1   The benefits decision-making system forms a huge part of the administrative
               justice landscape in the United Kingdom however, the system is performing
               poorly. Individuals often lack knowledge as to their possible entitlements; the
               application  process  can  be  inaccessible  and  confusing;  and  many  are
               incorrectly denied benefits to which they are entitled, or have their benefits
               stopped  or  reduced  when  they  are  wrongly  sanctioned.  Challenging
               incorrectly made decisions is often stressful and lengthy and many individuals
               give  up  when  faced  with  a  long  fight  for  their  entitlement.   Being  denied
                                                                       2
               benefits  can  have  a  devastating  impact  on  individuals’  and  their  families’
               lives. It can plunge people into debt, forcing them to rely on food banks, result
                                                                              3
               in  eviction  from  their  homes  and  exacerbate  or  create  health  issues.   As  a
               result there is a fundamental lack of trust and confidence in the system.


          1  P. Alston, ‘Statement on Visit to the United Kingdom by Professor Phillip Alston, United National
          Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights’ (November 2018) p.5.
          2   As  explained  in  Chapter  3  there  is  a  two-stage  process  to  challenging  a benefits decision:  (i)  an
          internal review by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (or Department for Communities in
          Northern  Ireland)  called  mandatory  reconsideration;  and  if  that  is  not  successful  claimants  may  (ii)
          appeal to an independent tribunal. For example, since PIP was introduced in 2013, up to September
          2020 4.2 million initial decisions have been made by the DWP. Mandatory reconsideration has been
          requested in 965,260 or 23 per cent of cases. In 81 per cent (779,590) of cases the award has remained
          unchanged following the mandatory reconsideration. However, only 379,630 claimants go on to lodge
          an appeal after a mandatory reconsideration, despite the fact that 67 per cent of appeals that reach a
          hearing our successful (Statistics do not include decisions made by the Department for Communities
          which  are  recorded  separately)  (DWP,  ‘Personal  Independence Payment  statistics  to  January 2021’,
          Table 5A (March 2021)).
          3  The Low Commission, Getting it right in social welfare law: the Low Commission’s follow-up report
          (2015),  G.  McKeever,  M.  Simpson  and  C. Fitzpatrick,  Destitution and  Paths  to  Justice  (The  Legal

                                                                                   6
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20