Page 97 - Reforming Benefits Decision-Making
P. 97

264
               phone.   Some  appellants  have  also  found it  difficult to find  a quiet  space
                                              265
               where they will not be interrupted.
          3.50  For some appellants with disabilities and mental health conditions the thought
               or process of travelling to a hearing may be physically difficult or stressful
               and anxiety inducing. Some appellants may also be more comfortable in their
               own space than at a hearing centre. For these appellants remote hearings are
               likely to be preferrable. However, all consultees recognised that this would
               not  be  the  case  for  all  appellants.  Some  appellants  will  find  it  much  more
               difficult to engage remotely (either by phone or video) and attempting to do
               so may be detrimental to some appellants’ health. Complex cases will also be
               better suited to face-to-face hearings. Some consultees felt that cases where an
               interpreter  was  required  were  also  better  suited  to  face-to-face  hearings,
               although others felt that having an interpreter on the phone had worked fine.
               We  note  that  the  Cloud  Video  Platform  now  has  the  ability  to  facilitate
                                     266
               simultaneous translation.

          3.51  A number of consultees raised concerns about technical issues that they had
               faced  with  remote  hearings.  For  example,  at  the  start  of  the  pandemic
               telephone  hearings  having  a  maximum  of  five  users  which  meant  that  an
               appellant’s representative was not able to attend where there are three panel
               members, the clerk and the appellant. However, a new telephone system has
               subsequently  been  put  in  place  which  allows  for  a  greater  number  of
               participants.  Consultees  also  reported  instances  of  appellants  not  being
               notified that their hearing is running late, of not being provided with a hearing
               time,  or  being  provided  with  the  wrong  hearing  time.  In  respect  of  video
               hearings,  there  have  been  issues  with  internet  connectivity  and  a  lot  of
               technical  and  administrative  support  required  to  ensure  that  they  function
               smoothly. Working Party members and consultees also raised concerns that
               appellants would not have the necessary equipment or internet access required

          264  K. McKechnie, Impact of Covid 19 on People with Disabilities and their Carers (Child Poverty
          Action Group, July 2020).
          265  Ibid.
          266  This is done by placing the interpreter and the appellant in a separate virtual room whilst still in the
          hearing, where the interpreter can translate without being heard by anyone other than the person they
          are translating for.


                                                                                  88
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102