Page 123 - Reforming Benefits Decision-Making -(updated - August 2021)

to a list of options for specialist advisors. The list would include local, in-
357
person advice providers, as well as services delivered remotely. For remotely
delivered advice, users would be able to contact specialist legal advisors
directly through a video chat function built into the platform. Remotely
delivered advice would be augmented by client sided assistance providing
358
practical, technical and emotional support.
4.53 The advice portal recommended above would not (at least initially) have all of
the features of the Online Advice Platform and would be focused specifically
on benefits advice provision. However, we hope that, if successful the advice
portal would provide a model for the development of a broader service with
the additional features described above.

Appealing a decision

Completing the application

4.54 As explained in Chapter 3, for UC, PIP and ESA, appellants are able to either
appeal by post or through an online application process. The online
application process is part of the broader HMCTS Reform Programme that is
currently ongoing. Although HMCTS has made clear that appellants will
continue to be able to appeal through a paper-based channel, it is expected
that across the court and tribunal system, the vast majority of cases will be
resolved online. The pandemic has accelerated many aspects of the Reform
Programme.

357 Possibly using similar technology to Victoria Legal Aid’s ORBIT. See R. Smith, ‘ORBIT: not just a
chewing gum’ (Law Technology and Access to Justice, 2018).
358 See, for example L. Ho and A. Fife, Pro bono legal services via video conferencing: Opportunities
and Challenges (Australian Pro Bono Centre, July 2015), pp. 3, 13 and 16. Roger Smith and Alan
Paterson also refer to a study carried out in 1996 and funded by the Nuffield Foundation, which found
that self-help kiosks set up in courts “worked best when fed, watered and tendered by living people
rather than just dumped and left in dark courthouse corners”. The report had found that the best kiosk
was one which was set up in a law library and supervised by staff. See Roger Smith and Alan Paterson,
Face to Face Legal Services and their Alternatives: Global Lessons from the Digital Revolution (2014)
p. 55-56.

114