Page 134 - Reforming Benefits Decision-Making -(updated - August 2021)
P. 134

where this can avoid claimants having to go through an appeal. The Working
               Party’s proposed  solution provides a  direct right  of appeal to  the  Tribunal
               whilst requiring that the DWP review its decision before the appeal
               progresses. In this way,  where the DWP does not change the decision
               following its  review, the appeal may  proceed  without  claimants having to
               make another application.

          5.7   The Working Party has  highlighted both  the opportunities presented by
               technology and the barriers that it can cause. When used well, digitisation can
               enable more  streamlined  processes, increase accessibility, for example, by
               broadening access  to  services  for those who  may find it difficult to attend
               assessments and hearings in person, and prevent claimants having to
               repeatedly provide the same information in different contexts. However, such
               developments require transparency around what is and is not being automated
               and digitised, how this is being done, and the technological capability of the
               systems. It also requires  Government departments to work  together in  a
               joined-up  way.  Crucially,  DWP  and  HMCTS  must  remain  aware  of  the
               difficulties that digitisation poses  for those who are digitally excluded and
               provide meaningful alternative routes  of  engagement for  them.  This is a
               particular issue for  UC,  where  proper  alternative  channels for making and
               managing a claim are urgently required to ensure UC works for everyone.

          5.8   Finally, the benefits  system is complex. Understanding entitlements,
               managing claims and appealing incorrect decisions can be overwhelming and
               stressful  and have detrimental impacts on individuals’ health. Access to
               information, advice and support  is therefore crucial to ensuring individuals
               receive  the benefits that  they are entitled to. An  absence of these key
               mechanisms not only comes at a significant cost to the individual, but also to
               Government more widely given the knock-on effects on debt, homelessness,
               and health-care  services. We  therefore recommend improvements to
               information provision, signposting to advice  and  the use of  technology  to
               deliver that advice where appropriate. However, we recognise the challenges
               of providing  sufficient  levels  of advice and support  in the post-LASPO
               funding landscape and very much hope that funding for early legal advice will
               be reinstated.





          125
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139