Page 68 - Reforming Benefits Decision-Making -(updated - August 2021)
P. 68

replace rules-based processing steps. However, this could cover a whole range
                                                                          188
               of processes, many of which may be important to decision making.
          2.89  One  of  the issues in the  Johnson  and  Pantellerisco  cases was a lack of
               transparency about what  the actual constraints of  the UC system and other
               computer systems  it  interfaces with are, and  the  ability  to adapt the UC
               system to deal with unforeseen issues caused by the automation.

          2.90  There is legitimate concern amongst claimants and civil society organisations
               regarding the use of automation and artificial intelligence in fraud detection
               and prevention. Privacy International  sent a  series of  FOIA  requests to the
               DWP asking for further information about the use of artificial intelligence for
               fraud prevention referenced in the DWP’s annual report. The DWP refused to
               provide information on the criteria or indicators used by the system to flag
               someone as likely to be committing fraud, or the code of the algorithm being
               used. They  relied on FOIA exemption that release would prejudice the
               prevention and detection of fraud and crime.
                                                      189
























          188  The only processes that we are aware that have been automated are pensions claims. See Convedo,
          ‘How Intelligent Automation is improving public services’.
          189   Privacy International, ‘Shedding light  on the DWP Part 2  –  A Long Day’s Journey  Towards
          Transparency’ (February 2021).


          59
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73