Page 79 - Reforming Benefits Decision-Making -(updated - August 2021)
P. 79

mandatory reconsideration process before they can appeal to the independent
               tribunal.   On  appeal,  the  claimant  must  complete  an  appeal  form  (either
                       212
               online or on paper) and submit it to Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals
               Service (HMCTS).  This involves explaining their reasons for challenging
                                213
               the decision, as well as providing their evidence, for a second time.

          3.4   This two-stage appeals  structure  is confusing  and time consuming for
               claimants who struggle to understand the process and often find it extremely
               stressful. We  are  concerned that these difficulties are causing  claimants to
               drop out of the appeals  process even when  they have a  meritorious  claim.
               Between  April  2013  and  September  2020,  780,000  PIP  awards were
               unchanged following mandatory reconsideration. Of those, only 360,000 (46
               per cent) of claimants went on to lodge an appeal. This is despite the fact that
               67 per cent of appeals that proceeded to a hearing were successful. Another 13
               per cent of appeals lodged were lapsed, meaning that the DWP changed its
               decision  in  the appellant’s favour before  the appeal  was heard by the
               Tribunal.  This suggests that there are more claimants who have a wrong
                       214
               decision but do not go on to appeal it.

          3.5   This chapter  looks  at how the mandatory reconsideration  and appeals
               processes are currently functioning and what improvements could make them
               more effective and easier for claimants to challenge incorrect decisions.


          Mandatory reconsideration

          3.6   Mandatory reconsideration was introduced in 2013.  Prior to this,  claimants
               could either ask the decision-maker to look at the decision again (a revision)


          212  With the exception of ESA claimants who would be eligible for ESA payment pending appeal. In
          the recent case of R (Connor) v Secretary of State 1 [2020] EWHC 1999 (Admin), the Court held at
          para 34 that for these claimants’ mandatory reconsideration was an unjustified impediment to the right
          of access to the court guaranteed by Article 6 ECHR, as there was no good reason for not applying the
          ‘ESA pending appeal’ rule during the mandatory reconsideration period. ESA is the only benefit with a
          payment pending appeal and is being phased out as it is replaced by UC.
          213  In Northern Ireland appeal forms cannot be completed online. An NOA1 form must be downloaded,
          completed and either posted or emailed to the Appeals Service.
          214  DWP, PIP Statistics to January 2021 (see n. 2 above).


                                                                                  70
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84