Page 72 - Judicial Diversity Update report
P. 72

claims or different rights at stake – are far less likely to progress to higher
                 judicial  office.  It  is  important  to  understand  why  experience  gained  in  this
                 capacity does not translate into greater success in senior exercises.

          A route through the tribunals


             3.22.  The tribunals represent a large pool for senior appointments  – both those
                 serving in salaried roles and those gaining experience through fee-paid sitting.
                 The nature of the work varies considerably from chamber to chamber, with
                 judging at the First Tier in some chambers involving more questions of law,
                 others  more  questions  of  fact.  Upper Tribunal judges  deal  exclusively  with
                 matters of law, many in cases similar to those considered by High Court judges.

             3.23.  The Working Party has taken evidence from judges in entry-level positions,
                 who have struggled to secure promotion from tribunal roles. The sheer numbers
                 of  First  Tier  Tribunal  judges  mean  that  promotion  is  only  realistic  for  a
                 minority. While an organogram might indicate otherwise, the expert nature of
                 the work of the Upper Tribunal means that it does not provide a natural route
                 of advancement for most First Tier Tribunal judges.

             3.24.  The data suggests that there is limited value in fee-paid sitting in the First
                 Tier  Tribunal  for  those  who  seek  higher  appointment;  a  minority  of  senior
                 judges have been elevated through this route.

             3.25.  It has been repeatedly suggested to us that salaried appointment in the First
                 Tier Tribunal can function as a ‘trap’ for aspirant senior judges, who apply
                 expecting it to serve as a first step and then go nowhere. Unable to return to
                 practice, they find themselves stuck doing entry-level work which remains of a
                 certain type and then is not valued for the purpose of advancement. When they
                 apply for new roles, their years of tribunal work means that they are further
                 away in time from their experience in practice, which may have been assessed
                 as being of greater value for the purpose of higher judicial appointment.

             3.26.  We received evidence suggesting that, in the limited number of cases where
                 it does happen, promotion to the Upper Tribunal is achieved despite sitting
                 experience in the First Tier Tribunal rather than because of it. Indeed, we were
                 told  that  the  only  real  ‘promotion’  within  the  tribunals  is  from  fee-paid  to
                 salaried judge, within the same jurisdiction.



                                                                                    67
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77