Page 107 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 107

prospect  of  introducing  “Case  Builder”,  an  online  decision  tree  that  would
              provide structured guidance, and potentially produce template documents, before
              a person initiates a claim online.

          4.18 For housing disputes, any decision tree should assist people to identify who their
              dispute is against, whether the dispute relates to condition or status and should
              structure questioning so that, at the end of the process, the person is directed to
              the correct dispute resolution procedure. Any decision tree should offer drop-off
              points at key moments to legal advice available through the portal.

          Alternative dispute resolution

          4.19 As discussed in the previous chapter, pre-action protocols for housing disputes
              encourage parties to engage in ADR prior to the initiation of a claim. Yet unlike
              the pre-action Road Traffic Accident portal, pre-action ADR in housing is not
              well  joined  up  with  the  subsequent  court  process.  There  are  too  few  ADR
              providers. Arrangements for housing legal aid are an impediment to engagement,
              there  is  little  public  knowledge  about  ADR  and  arguably  inadequate  or
              infrequently  applied  consequences  for  failure  to  engage  with  it  prior  to
              commencing a claim.

          4.20 If pre-action ADR is to be encouraged by the courts, it should be part of a more
              structured, coherent pathway.  306  One way to make the dispute resolution process
              more coherent would be to incorporate ADR providers within the single point of
              entry for disputes. Mediators or alternate ADR providers should be incorporated
                                       307
              within  the  HCRS  pathway.   Parties  could  be  signposted  or  alerted to  ADR
              providers, or, where pre-action ADR is required under the protocol, the digital
              claim form through the HCRS should feature a pathway, nudge or dropoff point
              to  accredited  providers,  to  see  whether  parties  are  capable  of  resolving  their
              disputes at the pre-action stage. This pre-action ADR could also offer users Early
              Neutral  Evaluation  (ENE)  of the  strengths  and  weaknesses  of  their  disputes,
              using the experience and expertise of judges and specially trained case workers.
              Legal Help should be extended where necessary to cover the provision of advice
              and assistance for users participating in pre-action ADR, to encourage uptake


          306  Hodges, note 157 above p. 558.

          307  For instance, those conducting ENE through the Financial Ombudsmen Service, Tenancy Deposit
          Scheme or Ombudsmen staff responsible for negotiating with parties to disputes.

          101
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112