Page 103 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 103

largely been dealing with leasehold management, leasehold enfranchisement and
                                 295
              park homes disputes.  These include:

              (a)  instances of parallel jurisdiction requiring expertise, such as service charges;

              (b)  where  a  separate  determination  is  required  (by  virtue  of  powers  held  by
                  respective fora) but where the same facts and evidence apply to both, such
                  as  applications  for  lease  variations  (FTT)  and  claims  for  rectification
                  (County Court);

              (c)  where court and tribunal have partial jurisdiction, such as enfranchisement
                  claims where the landlord is missing; and

              (d)  convenience  in  dealing  with  all  elements  at  once,  such  as  payability  of
                  service charges. 296

          4.11 In our Working Party’s view, disputes such as those identified at (a) and (c) ought
              to be capable of being heard in one jurisdiction only, rather than there needing
              to a be a mechanism to respond to concurrency. While we do not offer a view on
              the types of dispute which ought to migrate (save perhaps for type (d)), plainly
              specialism ought to inform whether a dispute is transferred from one jurisdiction
              to another.

          4.12 Rationalising the housing disputes landscape will require ongoing diligence and
              oversight  of  the  deployment  of  judicial  resources  in  housing  disputes.  The
              MHCLG will be convening a Redress Reform Working Group in 2020, with an
              intention to promote greater rationalisation and coherence in the landscape of
              redress providers. This is welcome, but as we understand it, that Working Group
              is concerned with maladministration. There is a parallel need for leadership and
              oversight to ensure coherency in where court and tribunal disputes are heard, and
              in the rationalisation of judicial resources. We recommend the establishment
              of  a  judge-led  Working  Group  comprising  senior  courts  and  tribunals
              judiciary and senior Ministry of Justice and HMCTS staff to oversee the
              structure,  development  and  evolution  of  the  housing  disputes  landscape,
              with  a  view  to  promoting  greater  harmonisation  across  systems  and


          295  Ibid.

          296  Ibid p. 14-15.

          97
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108