Page 101 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 101

support amongst the profession for a specialist housing tribunal, on the basis that
             it would offer “greater procedural flexibility, more expertise, lower costs, and a
             greater  commitment  to  the  ‘enabling  role’  said  to  be  a  distinctive  feature  of
                      285
             tribunals”  but acknowledged hostility to the transfer of jurisdiction over claims
             for possession and disrepair in respect of rented dwellings, mobile homes and
                                     286
             caravans, to the FTT (PC).

          4.8 More recently, in November 2018, the MHCLG issued a Call for Evidence for a
                           287
             Housing  Court.   The  Civil  Justice  Council  formed  the  view  that  the  money
             needed  to  create  a  sole  forum  would  be  better  spent  elsewhere, 288   the  HLPA
             generally opposed the proposal, on the basis that the Call for Evidence appeared
                                                     289
             motivated by a desire for speedier evictions.  The Chartered Institute of Legal
             Executives  (CILEX)  thought  a  new  integrated  Housing  Court  would  benefit
             litigants, subject to adequate judicial specialisation, court staff and court locations
                                           290
             so as to promote access to justice.





          285  Ibid, para 5.28.

          286   The  Law  Commission,  Housing:  Proportionate  Dispute  Resolution  –  The  Role  of  Tribunals
          (Consultation  Paper No 180), para 3.1, available at https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/lawcom-prod-
          storage-
          11jsxou24uy7q/uploads/2015/03/cp180_Housing_Proportionate_Dispute_Resolution_Role_of_Tribuna
          ls.pdf  The FTT (PC) was established in 2013, as an amalgamation of the Residential Property Tribunal
          Service (within which there was a number of disparate jurisdictions), the Agricultural Lands Tribunal,
          and the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, Edward Cousins, ‘The Land Registration Jurisdiction: An
          Analysis of the First Twelve Years’, in Amy Goymour, Stephen Watterson and Martin Dixon (eds.), New
          Perspectives on Land Registration: Contemporary Problems and Solutions (Hart Publishing, Oxford,
          2018), p. 26 - 27. A 2003 Law Commission report explains the confusing arrangements prior to the
          introduction of the Property Chamber, see Law Commission, ‘Land Valuation and Housing Tribunals:
          The Future’ (2003), p 93 (Appendix A).

          287  Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachmen
          t_data/file/755326/Considering_the_case_for_a_housing_court.pdf

          288  Available at https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/civil-justice-council-says-no-need-for-specialist-ho
          using-court/5069016.article?utm_source=dispatch&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=%20GAZ14
          1016

          289  Available at http://www.hlpa.org.uk/cms/2019/01/hlpa-housing-court-consultation-response/

          290  Available at https://www.cilex.org.uk/~/media/pdf_documents/main_cilex/policy_and_governance/
          consultation_responses/cilex_submission_-_housing_courts_call_for_evidence.pdf?la=en
          95
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106