Page 12 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 12

1.4 The prospect of early legal advice and intervention to address housing problems,
             homelessness  and  associated  or  underlying  issues  (such  as  benefits,  family  or
             mental health issues) has been greatly attenuated by the cuts to civil legal aid
             introduced by the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012
             (LASPO). The funding cuts have caused large parts of the housing advice sector
             to collapse, resulting in “advice deserts” across huge swathes of the country and
             leaving  many  with  nowhere  to  go  when  facing  a  housing  problem.    The
             introduction  of  court  closures  to  part-fund  Her  Majesty’s  Court  and  Tribunal
             Services  (HMCTS)  Reform  Programme  (Reform  Programme)   11   has  further
             frustrated access to justice, reducing attendance rates of respondents because they
             simply cannot afford to attend possession hearings outside their own towns.

          1.5 While  sources  of  advice  have  been  reducing,  ways  in  which  disputes  may  be
             resolved or problems solved have been proliferating. Alongside this, the housing
             dispute resolution landscape suffers from disaggregation: there are just too many
             places a person might go to resolve a dispute. There is a lack of coherence in
                                             12
             regulatory application and oversight  and a need for greater emphasis on early
             resolution,  conciliatory  measures  and  ways  to  navigate  the  dispute  resolution
             system.

          1.6  There  have  been  several  significant  proposals  for  changes  to  regulation  and
              dispute resolution in housing in recent years, including:








          11  The Reform Programme is predicated on the expanded use of technology and the development of
          accessible digital court and tribunal processes to extend access to justice to those who have historically
          been excluded, by virtue of legal cost, delay and complexity, from the justice system. Sale of the estate
          has so far contributed more than 22% of the total cost of the Reform Programme, National Audit Office,
          ‘Transforming courts and tribunals – a progress update’, September 2019, para 2.1 available at https://
          www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Early-progess-in-transforming-courts-and-tribunals.pdf

          12  As discussed at length in Chapter 4, the bifurcation of housing disputes between court and tribunal
          remains  an  issue.  Further,  the  landscape  for  redress  for  complaints  against  housing  providers  is
          disaggregated;  the Property  Redress  Scheme,  the  Housing  Ombudsman, the  Local  Government  and
          Social Care Ombudsmen the Property Ombudsman, the Tenancy Deposit Scheme, the Deposit Protection
          Scheme and MyDeposits have distinct dispute resolution processes for disputes initiated by a tenant
          against a landlord. See paragraph 4.1 below.

                                                                                   6
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17