Page 14 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 14

17
             (e)  the  commencement  of  the  online  possession  project,   which  will  digitise
                 elements of possession claims as part of the Reform Programme.

          1.7 While individually encouraging, none of these offers a holistic solution for the
             housing dispute resolution/problem-solving system. Nor do they offer a unified
             architecture in which tenants and landlords can effectively vindicate rights and
             interests, without recourse to eviction, conflict and financial loss.

          The Working Party

          1.8 The starting point for this Working Party was to develop proposals to create a
             more unified and accessible housing dispute system. Around the same time, in
             November 2018, the MHCLG called for evidence on the proposal for a Housing
                   18
             Court.  That consultation considered the current model of dispute resolution, the
             extent to which housing disputes are currently split between the First-tier Tribunal
             (Property  Chamber)  and  the  County  Court  and  whether  there  was  a  case  for
             consolidation into a solitary jurisdiction. It prompted us to consider not only the
             current landscape, but more fundamentally, whether there are potentially better
                                              19
             methods to resolve housing disputes.

          1.9  Our Working Party was convened in March 2019. Over the last 12 months, we
              have considered evidence and ideas on how best to improve access to justice in
              housing disputes. We have not sought to duplicate existing exercises in reform
              although there  are  areas  where  we  have  built upon pre-existing  proposals  or
              reforms, for instance with respect to the Housing Complaints Resolution Service
              and cross-ticketing (see Chapter 4 below). Instead, we set out to explore what
              type of housing dispute fora could best promote access to justice, whether there
              was a role for expanding alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms in the
              system  and  what  role  digitisation  should  have  against  the  background  of the
              Reform Programme. As with all JUSTICE working parties, our focus has been
              on procedures and processes.

          17  The project will commence in 2020 and “will improve, automate and streamline the shorthold tenancy
          possession process”, available at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/hmcts-reform-update-civil#possession

          18  MHCLG, ‘Considering the case for a Housing Court: A Call for Evidence’, November 2018, available
          at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/75
          5326/Considering_the_case_for_a_housing_court.pdf

          19  At the time of our reporting, there was no indication as to whether the Government intended to proceed
          with a solitary Housing Court.
                                                                                   8
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19