Page 19 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 19

2.9   What these developments reflect is that the traditional adversarial model has
                                                                          35
                been  found  wanting  in  terms  of  access,  unmet  need,  delay,   cost  and
                satisfaction with outcomes. Moreover, most people do not like going to court.
                If we can find a more compassionate, useful way of resolving their disputes
                                              36
                and problems, we should adopt it.  These developments have encouraged our
                Working  Party’s  thinking  and  our  proposal  for  something  holistic  and
                problem-solving, which looks to the drivers of a dispute and tries to identify,
                address and remedy them. We recommend the piloting of a new Housing
                Disputes Service (HDS).

          The Housing Disputes Service

          2.10   The HDS would not be a court, tribunal or ombudsman. It would be something
                entirely new. It is a proposed model for dispute resolution that would set out
                all  the  circumstances  and  relevant  issues  in  a  housing  relationship,  not
                confined by the parties’ initial assumptions as to what the issues are, which
                can  themselves  reflect  an  information  imbalance  derived  from  unequal
                resources between the parties. The investigation would include identifying,
                assessing and attempting to find solutions for the underlying problems giving
                rise  to  the  housing  dispute  and  meeting  participants’  real  interests  in  the
                outcome. The aim is to ensure that all relevant areas of dispute are brought to
                the  surface,  including  compliance  with  notice  and  other  contractual  and
                regulatory requirements.

                                                                            37
          2.11   Although the HDS will need to evolve, both within a pilot period  and - if
                                                             38
                successful - once it starts to be rolled out nationally,  both geographically and
                in  terms  of  the  disputes  it  deals  with,  it  is  nonetheless  worth  pausing  to
                consider the nature of housing law and therefore of the potential ambit of the

          35  The Residential Landlords Association highlighted that the current average wait time in London for
          certain possession claims is 30 weeks from court application to bailiff enforcement. Wood, ‘The wait of
          justice:  the  slow  pace of the courts  in  Greater  London’  (Residential  Landlord  Association  Blog, 15
          January  2020)  available  at  https://research.rla.org.uk/research-blog/the-wait-of-justice-the-slow-pace-
          of-the-courts-in-greater-london/

          36  See the JUSTICE’s Understanding Courts, note 26 above, which made an array of recommendations
          aimed at improving a court and tribunal system alien and alienating for most citizens.

          37  See para 2.31.

          38  See para 2.20.

          13
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24