Page 22 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 22

individual issues and advising parties on respective rights and obligations to
                the highest level.

                                                                  42
          2.15   The service will need to cater for a wide range of issues.  It will need to take
                advantage  of  best  practice  in  its  processes, including  digital  case  files  for
                officers  and  an  accessible  digital  page  designed  for  lay  users,  full  of
                information on substantive rights and applicable regulatory standards. It will
                                                                                43
                also need to be accessible for those who experience digital exclusion,  so
                multiple methods of engaging with the service would be necessary. Looking
                beyond  the  obvious  parties,  local  authorities  have  numerous  regulatory
                                     44
                functions  over  housing   and  a  direct  interest  in proceedings  which  might
                result in an eviction where they have homelessness functions. Reference to
                the  proposed  service  allows  all  issues  and  all  parties  -  including  local
                authorities  and  other  enforcement  bodies  -  to  come  together  to  forge
                constructive solutions and ensure that valuable housing resources are put to
                their best use without introducing unnecessary adverse consequences.

          2.16   The intention is to establish a new culture, collaborative, open and ethical,
                                                         45
                designed to allow all parties to the relationship  to fulfil their continuing roles
                otherwise than at each other’s cost. The HDS would be an accessible form of
                dispute resolution designed to change culture not merely in dispute resolution,

          42  From the simple to the complex, from the purely legal to the exclusively factual, from high value
          disputes to the smallest amounts conceivable in contention, from what are civil claims to what may be
          criminal prosecutions.

          43  Digital exclusion describes “those who lack access either to the internet or to a device, or the skills,
          ability, confidence or motivation to use it – as well as those who rely on digital assistance”, JUSTICE
          (2018), Preventing Digital Exclusion from Online Justice para 1.8 available at https://justice.org.uk/wp-
          content/uploads/2018/06/Preventing-Digital-Exclusion-from-Online-Justice.pdf

          44  Some of them, such as licensing issues, referable to the FTT (PC) and then to the Upper Tribunal;
          others, such as environmental health matters or harassment and illegal eviction, to the magistrates’ court
          and then to the Crown Court.

          45  Here as elsewhere, parties includes external parties such as local authorities and relationships between
          them and others, including landlords; it could in some cases include the fire authority or, e.g., the police
          in cases of serious anti-social behaviour or social services where children, the elderly or the otherwise
          vulnerable are involved. Where there is a prima facie case for the exercise of powers by any such body,
          HDS would inform that body that it is to be a participant in the process; with one exception, it would be
          subject to determinations by HDS as to the use of its powers (as appealable as any other determination
          by HDS). The exception is where the police are prosecuting using conventional (not housing, i.e. Anti-
          social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014) criminal powers, e.g. fraud, assault, theft, etc.

                                                                                  16
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27