Page 27 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 27

housing  relationship  would  be  followed  by  open  discussion,
                        negotiation and mediation or other ADR approach.

                    (f)  Digital and data – the HDS would feature digital filing and case
                                           57
                        management systems,  capable of feeding data relating to dispute
                        type to regulators to assist them to make targeted interventions where
                        problems are arising. Digital case files should be used, capable of
                        seamless transfer to the court/tribunal stage. The HDS process would
                        be available to the court, thus diminishing if not eliminating the risk
                        of information imbalance or gaps arising through inequality of arms.

                    (g)  Non-adversarial – the process would be based on problem solving
                        and  resolving  a  broader  array  of  interests  within  the  housing
                        relationship. In the HDS, there are no hearings or parties’ lawyers;
                        there are investigative interviews and ADR methods deployed but
                        nothing akin to an adjudicative hearing. The HDS will not feature
                        hearings with advocates taking positional approaches to a dispute.
                        Instead, there is to be a focus on the real problems, parties’ interests
                        and potential solutions that sustain future relations. Notwithstanding,
                        there would be an obvious need for independent legal advice outside
                        the process to be widely available and sufficiently remunerated for
                        participants in the HDS process.

          2.22   We appreciate this is a bold proposal. We recommend the HDS be a staged
                pilot  (discussed  in  more  detail  below),  assessed  against  robust  evaluative
                measures. Not all Working Party members support the proposal for a pilot of
                the HDS concept. Their concerns are articulated in Annexure B of this report.
                Tenant lawyers we spoke to expressed concern about equality of arms for
                          58
                vulnerable   participants  in  the  HDS.  They  were  also  concerned  about  the
                sustainability of legal aid practices since many have become reliant on costs
                orders in successful cases for funding. The biggest concern was that the HDS




          57  For those lacking digital capacity, alternate methods of engagement – over the phone, through paper
          correspondence and face-to-face – will be available.

          58  See paras immediately below.

          21
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32