Page 141 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 141

therefore, in my view assist with the interpretation of sub-paragraph (m),
                                                                            334
                 which is dealing with an ENE hearing as part of the court process.
             30. Reference is also made in the report to Article 5(2) of the Mediation Directive
                            335
                 2008/52/EC,  which provides:
                 1. A court before which an action is brought may, when appropriate and
                 having regard to all the circumstances of the case, invite the parties to use
                 mediation in order to settle the dispute. The court may also invite the parties
                 to attend an information session on the use of mediation if such sessions are
                 held and are easily available.

                 2. This Directive is without prejudice to national legislation making the use
                 of mediation compulsory or subject to incentives or sanctions, whether before
                 or after judicial proceedings have started, provided that such legislation does
                 not prevent the parties from exercising their right of access to the judicial
                 system.

             31. This Directive, together with the Directive on Consumer ADR 2013/11/EU,
                 was considered in the case of Menini v Banco Popolare Societa Cooperativea
                 (Case C-75-16).  In that case, the Court held, inter alia, that:

                 Mediation is defined (at Article 3(a) of the 2008 Directive) as “a structured
                 process, however named or referred to, whereby two or more parties to a
                 dispute attempt by themselves, on a voluntary basis, to reach an agreement
                 on the settlement of their dispute” (para 49).

             32. The voluntary nature of mediation lies in the fact that the parties are in charge
                 of the process and may organise it as they wish and terminate it at any time
                 (para 50).  It was important that parties could withdraw from the procedure at
                 any stage if they were dissatisfied with its performance or operation (para 57).
                 Requiring  parties  to  demonstrate  a  valid  reason  for  withdrawing  would
                 restrict their access to the judicial system (para 66).


          334  Although it is fair to note that Moylan LJ commented that the court’s engagement with mediation had
          “progressed  significantly”  since  Halsey  was  decided:  His  Lordship  declined  to  decide  whether  it
          remained good law.

          335  This Directive has been implemented in the UK by the Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer
          Disputes (Competent Authorities and Information) Regulations 2015/542.  It does not apply to housing
          cases.
          135
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146