Page 144 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 144

for  example, most  advice  on  homelessness  and  advice  on  notices  seeking
                 possession prior to issue of court proceedings. Moreover, the fees that firms
                 earn  from  advising  on  the  County  Court  duty  desk  at  initial  hearings  of
                 possession cases do not cover costs. HLPA members carry out this work to
                 ensure  that  vulnerable  tenants  are  represented  and  remain  in  their  homes.
                 These  cases  do  not  represent  a  viable  financial  proposition  alone.  HLPA
                 members survive precariously due to fees made through costs being awarded
                 at inter partes rates in judicial review and in possession cases, which can be
                 more than three times higher than legal aid rates 337 . The HDS would end this
                 cross  subsidy  and  so  –  without  a  huge  increase  in  rates,  sufficient  to
                 compensate for both this difference in rates and the decline in volume of work
                 – would lead to the closure of what remains of legal aid provision.

          The process of the Working Party
             41. A major concern which we expressed from the outset was the composition of
                 the Working Party. The only members with recent experience of acting for
                 tenants and people in housing need were Tessa Buchanan and Daniel Clarke,
                 on behalf of the Housing Law Practitioners’ Association, and John Gallagher,
                 on behalf of Shelter. Such fundamental changes to the justice system as are
                 contemplated by the proposed HDS needed to be considered both at greater
                 length and by a Working Party that was more representative of tenants and
                 homeless  persons.  We  accept  that  JUSTICE  took  evidence  from  other
                 practitioners, but the direction of the central idea was clearly determined in
                 advance and the views of those consulted externally appeared to make little
                 or no impact unless they were favourable to the proposals.  This is reflected
                 in the fact that the report does not indicate which of the persons consulted
                 opposed the HDS and which supported it.  We consider that the report should
                 have made clear that this radical suggestion is made without the support of
                 any (so far as we are aware) tenants’ representatives or organisations.

             42. The lack of adequate  representation was compounded by the fact that the
                 Working Party process did not allow anything like sufficient time for detailed
                 consideration of something as revolutionary as the HDS. There were some six
                 two-hour meetings of the full Working Party, and five two-hour meetings of
                 each of the three sub-groups. The earlier meetings were largely devoted to

          337   Compare  the  hourly  rates  in  the  hourly  rates  set  out  in  Schedule  1  to  the  Civil  Legal  Aid
          (Remuneration)  Regulations  2013  (ranging  from  £46.53  for  some  Legal  Help  work  to  £71.55  for
          certificated work in the higher courts) with the Government’s Solicitors’ Guideline Hourly Rates of up
          to £317 for a Grade A fee earner in central London.
                                                                                 138
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149