Page 50 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 50

Evaluative           Description
         measures
         Timeliness           Evaluation  should  capture  time  taken  from  initiating  to
                              resolution of the claim through the pilot, including for dispute
                              type.  Data  from the  pilot  should  be measured  against  pre-
                              existing  processes  within  the  pilot’s  geographic  area  or  a
                              control.  Comparative  measures  could  be  drawn  against
                              historic  completion  times  for  disputes  brought  from  the
                              pilot’s geographic areas to County Court, First-tier Tribunal
                              and other redress schemes.
         Procedural justice   Information on:
         outcomes                •  claimant or defendant engagement with the process
                                                                          117
                                     and other sources of legal help and advice;
                                 •  nature and volume of the evidence produced;
                                 •  opportunities  for  parties  to  engage  effectively  and
                                     meaningfully in the process;
                                 •  whether the HDS is perceived as neutral;
                                 •  the degree to which people trust the HDS;
                                 •  understanding   the   instruction,   method   and
                                     implications of the process; and
                                 •  whether people are treated with dignity and respect
                                                       118
                                     through the process.
         Substantive          Substantive outcomes achieved through the HDS should be
         outcomes             measured  against  controls.  For  example,  we  would  expect
                              that  the  problem-solving  approach  would  achieve  a  high


          117  The US Centre for Court Innovation ‘Measuring Perceptions of Fairness: An Evaluation Toolkit’ was
          collaboratively produced between the Center the, National Judicial College, and the U.S. Department of
          Justice’s  Bureau  of  Justice  Assistance.  The  toolkit  contains  three  evaluative  instruments,  Self-
          Assessment  of  Court  practices,  Courtroom  Observation  Instrument  and  Defendant  Exit  Interview
          designed to assess procedural justice and fairness within judicial processes. The toolkit assesses against
          measures  which  capture  whether  a  process  is  “Ensuring  Understanding”,  “Providing  Voice”  and
          “Demonstrating Respect” for users and would be a useful toolkit to assess procedural fairness and justice
          in the HDS.

          118   Byrom, ‘Developing the detail: Evaluating the Impact of Court Reform in England and Wales on
          Access to Justice, (Legal Education Foundation, 2019) p. 19 available at https://research.thelegaleducat
          ionfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Developing-the-Detail-Evaluating-the-Impact-of-
          Court-Reform-in-England-and-Wales-on-Access-to-Justice-FINAL.pdf

                                                                                  44
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55