Page 106 - When Things Go Wrong
P. 106

There are a lot of assumptions made about the experiences of families
                   within inquiry processes with no underpinning evidence. These
                   assumptions are typically made by (senior) professionals who may base
                   them on their own understanding of how things should be.  Embedded
                   within these well-meaning assumptions are clichés, judgements and often
                   a good dose of patronising. A key assumption is catharsis and I find it
                   bewildering and disconcerting that the experience of giving evidence in
                   an  enquiry  process,  being  forced  to  re-live  and  revisit  unspeakably
                   traumatic events and be questioned (or even interrogated) about them is
                   seen as somehow positive.

         6.35  Nevertheless, inquests and inquiries should seek to promote clarity for those
               affected by catastrophic events, both through their findings, and through the
               way in which they treat bereaved people and survivors. An entirely voluntary
               mechanism that appears to have served a cathartic function is IICSA’s Truth
               Project. 303  This facility allows survivors to share their story in a confidential,
               secure environment. The Working  Party understands that  the Project  has
               received a 98% satisfaction rate from its users, many of whom disclose that the
               project represents the first time they have felt listened to  by  someone in
               authority since suffering abuse, often several decades prior. The Truth Project
               does not form part of the evidential base for the inquiry hearings but is used to
               produce an aggregated and anonymised statistical pool.

         6.36  INQUEST’s Family Listening Days, including the Grenfell Consultation cited
               a  number of times in this report, provide another forum for bereaved and
               survivor testimony.  These  reflective  events also  “offer  public  bodies,
               policymakers and other bereavement-focused organisations the opportunity to
               hear  directly  from  family  members  about  the circumstances surrounding a
               person’s death in detention/custody, or in a  similarly contentious
               circumstance” 304  but without the pressure of the formal process and constraint
               of giving evidence.  There is a particular emphasis on hearing families'
               recommendations for improving current practice.


         303  See IICSA website, ‘The Truth Project’.

         304  See INQUEST website, ‘Family Listening Days’.
         99
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111