Page 61 - When Things Go Wrong
P. 61

invokes the SPI, bereaved people should be directed to an engaging, clear
               and professional quality video on what to expect at an inquest. It could
               feature bereaved family members who have experienced the process as well as
               court professionals explaining their roles and should lead viewers through
               actual inquest locations  to give a  realistic impression of  the  process.  The
               production should be made with the collaboration of bereaved people.

         The post-mortem

         3.43  Where a coroner has ordered that a post-mortem examination take place,
               Regulation 13(3)(a) of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 requires
               that particular people be notified. 163  However, the experience of our members
               is that notification often comes too late for family members to make informed
               decisions about the possibility of non-invasive post-mortems or objecting to
               the post-mortem  altogether.  Article 8 ECHR may oblige a coroner to take
               reasonable steps to identify relatives in advance of the post-mortem,
               “reasonable steps” being dependent on the circumstances of  death and the
               urgency of the post-mortem. 164  We recommend that where a post-mortem is
               to take place, the coroner should notify all family members whose details
               are known to the coroner’s office.

         3.44  Under Rule 13 of the Coroners (Inquests) Rules 2013, interested persons have
               a right to receive, on request, a copy of the post-mortem report and any other
               report or relevant document, subject to the qualifications set out in Rule 15.
               From our experience, some coroners adopt a paternalistic approach to post-
               mortem results, in extreme cases preventing bereaved people from reading the
               results when they consider that these might be distressing. This approach is
               unlawful and denies bereaved people autonomy. We recommend that in order
               to give fair notice of potentially distressing content, post-mortem reports
               disclosed to family members should be concealed within two envelopes,
               with a warning inside the  outer envelope that the report  may contain
               distressing information.

         163  The next of kin or the personal representative of the deceased or any other interested person who has
         notified the coroner in advance of his or her desire to be represented at the post-mortem examination.
         164  Thomas QC, Straw, Machover and Friedman QC, supra note 148, paras 19.14-15.
                                                                                  54
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66