Page 62 - When Things Go Wrong
P. 62

IV. PRE-HEARING PROCEDURE

         We are not prepared to participate in a process where the presence of our clients is
         pure window-dressing, lacking all substance, lacking all meaning and would achieve
         absolutely nothing other than lending this process the legitimacy it does not have and
         deserve. Philippa Kauffman QC. 165

         4.1   It is a strength of inquests and inquiries that the procedure is a flexible one.
               Structure is  certainly  provided by the relevant primary and secondary
               legislation. 166  However, procedural requirements are less stringent than in the
               civil  and  criminal  jurisdictions.  There  are  no  practice  directions  and  no
               procedure  rule committees keeping the secondary legislation under review.
               This  is partly a reflection of  their fact-finding remit and ostensibly non-
               litigious nature. In the case of inquiries, flexibility is also appropriate given the
               wide range of potential subject matter. 167

         4.2   But lack of standard procedure has had the consequence that inquests and
               inquiries have not always benefitted from the  kind  of innovation in best
               practice developed in the criminal and civil jurisdictions. While the Woolf and
               Jackson reforms encouraged a “cards on the table” approach to civil litigation,
               bereaved  interested  persons  in  inquests  typically  report  a  “drip-feed”  of
               documents in the months following the death, often with a glut of material
               arriving the night before or on the day of the hearing. Furthermore, despite the
               advances made  in  the  questioning of vulnerable  witnesses in  the criminal
               justice system (“CJS”), families in inquests are typically “not prepared for
               what they [have] described as the intensity and ferocity of the approaches taken
               by lawyers representing public authorities”. 168   This is  exacerbated by the
               difficulty in accessing public funding for representation at inquests under the
               current regime, which means that families are almost invariably left to navigate
               this adversarial battle without specialist legal support and whilst in the midst
               of grief.

         165  Undercover Policing Inquiry, Preliminary Hearing (21 March 2018).
         166  Principally, the Coroners and Justice Act 2009; Inquiries Act 2005; the Coroners (Inquests) Rules
         2013; the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013; and the Inquiry Rules 2006.
         167  Mackie, supra note 23.

         168  Jones, supra note 16, para 2.72.
         55
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67