Page 90 - When Things Go Wrong
P. 90

Prisons:  In  2017,  the Ministry of  Justice  spent  £4.2million  on  Prison  and
               Probation Service legal representation at prison inquests, while granting just
               £92k in legal aid to bereaved.

                         Julie’s Mental Health Foundation, BBC Radio 4 File on 4; INQUEST

         5.23  The imbalance exposed by  these figures serves  to preclude effective
               participation  and  may  in  consequence  impede  the ability  of  an  inquest to
               discharge its function as a full and fearless investigation.  The Lord
               Chancellor should amend the Exceptional Funding Guidance (Inquests)
               so as to provide non-means tested public funding for legal representation
               for families where the State has agreed to provide separate representation
               for one or more interested persons. 251

         Warning letters

         5.24  Our terms of reference explicitly prioritise the needs and experiences of
               bereaved people and survivors. However, it is axiomatic that inquires must
               extend fairness to all participants, including to those who may be criticised in
               any report arising from the process. The formal mechanism for giving notice
                                                                                  252
               to  those  who  may  be  subject  to  criticism  is  a  “representation  process”,
               encompassing  “Maxwellisation”  or  “Salmon Letters”  in non-statutory
               inquiries and “warning letters” in statutory inquiries.

         5.25  We recognise the importance of this process. The Stephen Lawrence
               Independent Review has been cited as an example of an investigation in which
               the final report was substantially amended in light of new information revealed
               by Maxwellisation. 253  However, a number of our consultees voiced concerns




         251  Amendment of the Guidance would bring a collateral benefit. In our experience, the availability of
         public funding for advocacy in Article 2 ECHR inquests invariably leads to extensive argument as to
         whether Article 2 is  engaged  (and  subsequent judicial review challenges). Adoption  of our
         recommendation would address this source of delay and expense.
         252  Terminology from Andrew Green QC, Tony Peto QC, Pushpinder Saini QC, Fraser Campbell and
         Ajay Ratan, ‘A Review of “Maxwellisation”’, 2016, para 2.
         253   Mark Ellison QC,  The Stephen  Lawrence Independent  Review: Possible corruption and role of
         undercover policing in the Stephen Lawrence case, Volume One (HC 2014, 1038-1), pp. 154-6.

         83
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95