Page 84 - Reforming Benefits Decision-Making
P. 84

e)  The DWP makes some claimants go through a ‘problem-solving’ stage
                   before they can submit a request for mandatory reconsideration. Whilst
                   the aim of this is well intentioned – to reduce a backlog of mandatory
                   reconsideration requests - it creates a two-tier system that is not set out in
                   law and can result in further delays to the appeals process.

          3.19  The DWP told us that none of these problems should be happening. However,
               this  serves  to  further  highlight  the  issue  discussed  in  Chapter  2  –  the
               disconnect between policy and practice and demonstrates the need for more
               robust monitoring and quality assurance processes.

          3.20  For those wishing to dispute a calculation of earnings, which are provided to
               DWP  by  HMRC’s  ‘real  time  information’  (RTI)  system,  there  is  a  further
               stage  in  the  redress  process.  A  change  to  a  claimant’s  UC  award  resulting
               from  a  change  of  RTI  information  does  not  constitute  a  decision  of  the
               Secretary  of  State.   In  order  to  obtain  a  decision,  which  can  then  be
                                 230
               challenged  by  way  of  mandatory  reconsideration  and  appeal,  the  claimant
               must first dispute the employed earnings figure and request the Secretary of
                                                                          231
               State to give a decision in relation to the amount of UC payable.  As with
               mandatory reconsideration, there are examples of claimants disputes not being
               progressed because they are not in the ‘correct’ format. Further, the DWP’s
               guidance  on  RTI  disputes  suggests  that  where  the  earnings  are  correct  no
               dispute should be raised.  However, the regulations provide a clear right to a
                                     232
               decision,  which  is  technically  required  before  a  mandatory  reconsideration
               can be requested.

          3.21  Further, the additional administrative hurdle of mandatory reconsideration can
               cause claimant confusion. Working Party members and consultees told us that
               claimants  often  do  not  understand  that  there  is  a  two-stage  process  to
               challenge a decision. We were also told it causes claimant fatigue; claimants

          230   s.159D(1)(b)(vi)  and  (2)  Social  Security  Administration  Act  1992;  Universal  Credit,  Personal
          Independence Payment, Jobseeker's Allowance and  Employment and Support  Allowance (Decisions
          and Appeals) Regulations 2013/381, reg 41(1).
          231   The  Universal  Credit,  Personal  Independence  Payment,  Jobseeker's  Allowance  and  Employment
          and Support Allowance (Decisions and Appeals) Regulations 2013/381, reg 41(3).
          232  DWP, ‘Real Time Information’ Universal Credit Guidance, (October 2020).


          75
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89