Page 89 - Reforming Benefits Decision-Making
P. 89

instance decision-making leading to a reduction in the number of decisions
                                       244
               that need to be challenged.
          3.30  We  appreciate  that  the  clearance  times  for  appeals  are  significantly  longer
               than  those  for  mandatory  reconsideration.   However,  we  believe  that  this
                                                      245
               recommendation still enables disputes to be resolved as early as possible due
               to  the  automatic  internal  review  which  we  propose  would  continue  to  take
               place.  This  means  that  disputes  that  would  have  been  resolved  at  the
               mandatory  reconsideration  stage  should  still  be  resolved  without  having  to
               wait  for  a  Tribunal  hearing.  However,  crucially,  it  has  the  advantage  that
               claimants  will  not  be  deterred  from  seeking  redress  by  having  to  make  a
               second application for an appeal. It will allow the Tribunal to actively case
               manage and therefore reduce delays in internal reviews taking place. It will
               also circumvent the current barriers that claimants are facing when requesting
               a mandatory reconsideration as it will be a step required by the Tribunal.

          Appeals

          Making an appeal


          Time limits

          3.31  Claimants  have  one  month  in  which  to  appeal  a mandatory reconsideration
               decision,  however  if  there  is  a  good  reason  for  missing  the  one-month
               deadline the Tribunal can still accept an appeal for up to 13 months after the
               decision.  Mandatory  reconsideration  notices  currently  state  that  claimants
               need to appeal within one month of the date of the letter. We were told by a
               number of advisers that, as a result, claimants are unaware of the 13 month
               ‘longstop’  and  wrongly  assume  that  if  they  have  missed  the  one-month


          244  We note that prior to the introduction of mandatory reconsideration, the FTT (SSCS) dealt with a
          much higher volume of appeals than it currently does. In 2012/13 the volume of appeals peaked at
          500,000, compared to around 160,000 in 2019/20. We appreciate that the volume of appeals was one of
          the  reasons  that  mandatory  reconsideration  was  introduced,  however,  it  has  resulted  in  significant
          difficulties for claimants seeking to challenge incorrect decisions.
          245  The median clearance time for SSCS appeals in 2020/21 was 26 weeks. See Ministry of Justice,
          ‘Tribunal Statistics Quarterly’ (see n. 33 above) Main Tables, Table T_1.


                                                                                  80
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94