Page 79 - Judicial Diversity Update report
P. 79

invested in directly supporting individuals at the Bar – including from minority
           groups  –  whom  they  consider  good  candidates  for  the  bench,  with
           encouragement, advice and support. While this is fantastic, as it is limited to
           barristers who judges know through Chambers or come across in court, it serves
           to further strengthen the existing pool. Senior solicitor judges – often supported
           by the best efforts of the Law Society – are also exhaustively speaking at events
           and  encouraging  applications  from  solicitor  candidates,  though  the  huge
           numbers and spread of solicitors makes this much more challenging. Extended
           formal and targeted mentoring of candidates from diverse backgrounds judged
           as having potential could see the appointment of more diverse candidates.

       4.12.  It is also worth noting that there are several consultancies – which include
           former JAC commissioners and panel members – who advise candidates on
           their applications, for a fee. We are not in a position to evaluate how useful
           these consultants are, but in that they offer insights into processes and ‘right
           answers’ it is concerning that they would only be available to candidates of
           means.

       Appointing  candidates  from  the  Crown  Prosecution  Service
       (CPS) and Government Legal Department (GLD)

       4.13.  In our original report we recommended the exploration of the CPS and GLD
           as  diverse pools  for judicial  appointments;  they  have  higher  percentages  of
           senior women and BAME lawyers than much of the rest of the legal profession.
           We are pleased by the JAC’s outreach to the CPS and are encouraged by the
           appointment of six Crown Prosecutors as Recorders in the most recent Recorder
           exercise (2019). Of these six, three were appointed to the Family jurisdiction
           and one to the Civil jurisdiction. Two were appointed as Recorders in Crime,
           though both had to resign from the CPS in order to take up the appointment.

       4.14.  While it is encouraging that the skills of a prosecutor appear to have been
           valued in the selection processes, Crown Prosecutors pay a high price to secure
           fee-paid sitting experience in their chosen jurisdiction. We reiterate our 2017
           recommendation that in appropriate cases the de facto requirement that Circuit
           judges have sat as Recorders be removed for experienced Crown Prosecutors.
           To this end we were encouraged by the 2017 appointment of Graham Reeds
           QC directly to the Circuit bench without any previous judicial experience.

       4.15.  We maintain that the GLD can be an important potential source of recruits
           to  the  judiciary.  We  are  pleased  by  outreach  events  targeting  government

       74
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84