Page 81 - Judicial Diversity Update report
P. 81

Apply the “equal merit provision” at sift and shortlist stages.

       4.19.  Over the last two years, the equal merit provision (EMP) has failed to live
           up to its promise as a diversity-enhancing tool; it was used three times in 2017-
                                                                              170
                                                   169
           2018 (and in each case on the basis of gender)  and not once in 2018-2019.
           Our 2017 report recommended extending the adoption of the EMP to earlier
           stages of the selection process.

       4.20.  We are pleased that in June 2019 the JAC extended the use of the EMP to
           shortlisting  as  well  as  final  decision-making  stages  of  all  appointment
                                                                      171
           processes, which greatly expands its potential to increase diversity.

       Introduce evidence-based training for selectors and judges.


       4.21.  We are pleased by the JAC’s focus on the training of panel members. We
           understand that there is both general and exercise-specific training of lay and
           judicial  panel  members  that  is  mandatory  and  delivered  in  person  by  an
           experienced trainer. The training includes information on the selection process
           or the exercise, and on fair selection principles and approaches (including about
           unconscious bias, transferable evidence, consistency in scoring and interview
           skills). The JAC has recently introduced a new appraisal process where the
           performance  of  lay  members is formally  reviewed every  18  months;  which
           supplements  ‘peer  review’  after  each  exercise  led  by  Quality  Assurance
           Managers.

       4.22.  We welcome this monitoring and evaluation, though urge that it be extended
           to gauging whether these processes may be increasing delivery of more diverse
           appointments.

       169  Judicial Appointments Commission, ‘Judicial Selection and Recommendations for Appointment:
       Official Statistics, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2018’, June 2018, available online at
       https://www.judicialappointments.gov.uk/sites/default/files/sync/about_the_jac/official_statistics/statis
       tics-bulletin-jac-2017-18.pdf
       170  Judicial Appointments Commission, ‘Judicial Selection and Recommendations for Appointment:
       Official Statistics, 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019’, June 2019, available online at
       https://www.judicialappointments.gov.uk/sites/default/files/sync/about_the_jac/official_statistics/statis
       tics-bulletin-jac-2018-19.pdf
       171  ‘JAC extends the use of equal merit provision to shortlisting to support diversity’, Judicial
       Appointments Commission, available online at https://www.judicialappointments.gov.uk/news/jac-
       extends-use-equal-merit-provision-shortlisting-support-diversity
       76
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86