Page 82 - Judicial Diversity Update report
P. 82

Data collection

             4.23.  We recommended improved data collection and transparency and are pleased
                 that  the JAC is  now collecting  and  publishing  social  mobility  statistics.  As
                 noted  above,  the  JAC  has  also  introduced  enhanced  information  on  the
                 professional background of appointees. While these are positive developments,
                 there is still much more data that is required to develop a full understanding of
                 those people applying and being appointed to judicial office, including the need
                 to  capture  more  intersectional  data  (See  Annex).  We  have  welcomed  the
                 introduction by the JAC to the Ministry of Justice’s Statistics team, currently
                 reviewing the approach to appointment statistics.

               Increasing the desirability of judicial roles

             4.24.  We also made recommendations aimed at working conditions of judges, with
                 a view to increasing the attractiveness of the job; a concern that was reinforced
                 with  the  evidence  gathering  for  this  Update.  We  are  pleased  that  concerns
                 around judicial pay and pensions have, at least in part, been addressed.

             4.25.  We  recommended  making  flexible  working  the  default  position  for  all
                 appointments. The observations in our report were reflected in that of the Senior
                 Salaries  Review  Body  (SSRB)  in  October  2018. 172  This  confirmed  that  a
                 perceived  lack  of  flexibility  in  judicial  work  discourages  applications,
                 particularly from women, with more than half of the women interviewed raising
                                                                   173
                 the concern (compared with around a quarter of the men).  Respondents noted
                 that there were few part-time salaried judicial positions, and were concerned
                 also about being allocated to a location that was inconvenient for their domestic
                               174
                 responsibilities.

             4.26.  The SSRB reported mixed responses about High Court judges having to go
                 on Circuit, noting ‘several respondents considering an application to the High

            172  Review Body on Senior Salaries, Supplement to the Fortieth Annual Report on Senior Salaries
            2018, Report No. 90: Major Review of the Judicial Salary Structure, October 2018, available at
            https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/751
            903/Supp_to_the_SSRB_Fortieth_Annual_Report_2018_Major_Review_of_the_Judicial_Salary_Stru
            cture.pdf
            173  Ibid, pp.60-61
            174  Ibid
                                                                                    77
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87