Page 80 - Judicial Diversity Update report
P. 80

lawyers and we note that a small number of government lawyers have been
                 appointed as Deputy High Court Judge and to the Upper Tribunal.
                                                                            167

               Ensure ethnic, gender and social diversity on selection panels.

             4.16.  We applaud the progress made by the JAC in increasing the diversity of lay
                 panel members. As of April 2019, 67% of lay panel members are women, 9%
                                                   168
                 are BAME and 14% have a disability.  We do not have a similar breakdown
                 for the diversity of judicial members, who are selected by the judiciary rather
                 than the JAC.

            4.17.  Relatedly, we welcome the diverse composition of the JAC Advisory Group
                 that reviews selection materials to ensure that the content is not inadvertently
                 advantageous to candidates from a particular background. They are provided
                 with a guide on quality assurance of selection materials and are introduced to
                 JAC selection processes. We understand that test materials go through a series
                 of quality assurance processes, including review by the JAC Diversity team and
                 by the JAC Advisory Group, as well as dry runs with mock candidates. All
                 exercises  have  an  Assigned  Commissioner  for  oversight  purposes,  the
                 progression of target groups is monitored and interviews are observed. We have
                 reservations  about  whether  lay  people  –  even  lay  people  from  diverse
                 backgrounds – can provide the expert scrutiny required to identify and address
                 inherent bias in materials and processes. In our view, given the high failure rates
                 of  particular  groups,  the  processes  need  independent,  specialist  review  and
                 analysis.

            4.18.  We endorse the JAC appointing the Work Psychology Group to assess its
                 processes,  which  has  provided  valuable  insight  into  progression  of  various
                 groups  through  different  stages  of  selection,  albeit  for  a  limited  number  of
                 exercises.  Given  the  need to  understand  where  and why  minorities  drop out
                 during selection processes, such expert analysis is critical. We are eager for the
                 results of the ‘deep dive’ into the reasons for the disproportionate failure of
                 minority groups in JAC exercises. We urge that this be undertaken in an open,
                 independent and speedy manner.


            167  For example, Lesley Smith, who was appointed to the Upper Tribunal, and Rowena Collins Rice,
            who was appointed as a Deputy High Court Judge.
            168  ‘Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) Diversity Update April 2019’, 2019, available online at
            https://www.judicialappointments.gov.uk/sites/default/files/sync/news-documents/jac-diversity-
            update-april-2019.pdf
                                                                                    75
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85