Page 86 - Judicial Diversity Update report
P. 86

it is true that there are more women and BAME people on the Bench now than
                 then, the pace of change has been unacceptably slow and the overall numbers
                 of women, BAME and other ‘non-traditional’ judges remain far too low.

             5.4. There  therefore  needs  to  be  a  public  acknowledgement  of  the  scale  of  the
                 problem  and  its  impact  on  the  quality  of  justice.  There  needs  to  be  a  real
                 commitment to change, backed up by action and practical steps rather than
                 words. And the steps taken need to be monitored continuously in order to ensure
                 and maintain progress.  Unwritten rules and hidden barriers, such as the lack of
                 access  to  fractional  or  flexible  working,  or  a  lack  of  clarity  as  regards  the
                 location of advertised vacant appointments, must be removed. A meaningful
                 judicial  career  path  needs  to  be  established,  allowing  judges  in  both  lower
                 courts and tribunals to prove themselves worthy of senior appointment. To the
                 extent that the senior judiciary is regarded as a ‘second career’, greater attention
                 must be paid to the pipeline and to ensuring that recruitment to the key feeder
                 roles – especially Recorder and Deputy High Court Judge – facilitates diversity
                 rather  than  maintains  the  status  quo.  This  commitment  to  change  needs  to
                 include a much greater willingness to make diverse appointments from non-
                 traditional  pools,  including  appointing  Court of  Appeal and  Supreme  Court
                 judges from outside the serving judiciary. In this context, we are pleased by the
                 recent appointment of an academic barrister directly into the Supreme Court,
                 though we also note that the making of appointments from non-traditional pools
                 was said to be likely to increase diversity at the senior levels of the judiciary.
                 We regret that so far that has not occurred.
                                                       184

             5.5. This all requires the judiciary urgently to adopt diversity as a pillar of its culture,
                 with every judge understanding and acknowledging its importance, and making
                 efforts  to  increase  inclusion.    Embedding  diversity  into  the  culture  means
                 championing a vision which recognises that in order to fairly administer and
                 deliver justice, the bench must better reflect the population it serves.  Judges
                 need greater support to understand and challenge their own biases, not only in
                 appointments processes but also in the execution of their judicial roles.  Our
                 judicial leaders have a critical role in setting the cultural tone and in accepting
                 their organisational and personal responsibility for driving diversity.


            ‘Merit’?


            184  ‘Professor Andrew Burrows appointed to the Supreme Court’, available online at
            https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/news/2019-07-24-professor-andrew-burrows-appointed-supreme-court
                                                                                    81
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91