Page 94 - Solving Housing Disputes
P. 94

267
              desert.   Our  Working  Party  is  therefore  concerned  that  the  time  limit  for
              homelessness  appeals to  the  County Court  is  too  short,  given  the  challenges
              around access to advice wrought by LASPO. To our mind, the time limit pre-
              dates  the  realities  of  LASPO.  It  is  not  enough time for  appellants  given  the
              limitations on advice provision on the ground. We recommend the time limit
              for appealing a local authority internal review decision on homelessness to
              a Circuit Judge pursuant to section 204 of the Housing Act 1996 ought to be
              extended from 21 to at least 28 days, to give appellants more time to access
              legal aid.

          3.71 There  is  an  associated  need  to  ensure that  where  a  local  authority  makes  an
              internal review decision which upholds a denial of homelessness assistance, the
              applicant can gain access to material from which the decision has been made to
              appraise  themselves  of  their  legal  position. Local  authorities  when  sending
              their  written  decision  from  an  internal  review  to  a  person  seeking
              homelessness assistance should offer the applicant access to the full case file
              from which the decision was made.

          3.72 One way to make this process easier might be through digital case files, which
              could then be transferred seamlessly to the courts, should the appellant elect to
              appeal the authority decision. The Traffic Penalty Tribunal (TPT) has had great
              success  in  working  with  all  local  authorities  across  England  and  Wales  in
              developing digital case files and digital pins. When a motorist challenges a local
              authority issued traffic penalty notice, something akin to an internal review is
              offered by the local authority. Should the charging authority reject the person’s
              representations,  they  issue  a  Notice  of  Rejection  of  Representations,  which
                                                                              268
              features a weblink and digital pin code to the TPT’s digital appeal system.  The
              pin code is used to populate all relevant details from the penalty notice to the
              TPT system, rather than the appellant having to input those details manually.

          3.73 We think it is worth exploring whether a similar approach could work within the
              context  of  local  authority  homelessness  decisions.  Applications  for
              homelessness assistance through a local authority portal could generate a unique

          267  For example, a tenant lawyer we spoke to at a roundtable in October works in Bristol, but provides
          housing representation through legal aid contracting across the West Country and into Wales, on account
          of the paucity of face-to-face advice in those regions

          268  Available at https://www.trafficpenaltytribunal.gov.uk/accessibility-and-the-tribunal/

                                                                                  88
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99