Page 64 - Reforming Benefits Decision-Making
P. 64

the  computer  programme  must  be  sophisticated  enough  to  enable  that  to
                      171
               happen.
          2.81  Since losing the  Johnson case DWP has subsequently made changes to the
               regulations so that cases such as Johnson’s are corrected where reported to
               it.  DWP told us that they are about to release functionality which should
                 172
               automatically  detect  such  cases.  This  begs  the  question  of  why  the  DWP
               maintained that it was not technically possible to deal with this issue and did
               not fix it sooner.

          2.82  Being paid on a weekly cycle may also mean that claimants are subject to the
               benefit  cap  even  though  they  are  working  and  earning  enough  to  meet  the
                         173
               exemption.   For  example,  a  year  has  13  four-week  periods  in  it,  but  12
               monthly assessment periods. Therefore, claimants paid on a 4-weekly cycle
               will, each year, have eleven UC assessment periods in which they receive one
               thirteenth  of  their  annual  salary,  and  one  assessment  period  in  which  they
               receive two thirteenths of their salary. For the assessment periods when they
               are receiving one thirteenth of their annual salary they may be treated  as if
               they have earned or worked less than the earnings exemption amount.

                                                                         174
          2.83  In  Pantellerisco  v  Secretary  of  State  for  Work  and  Pensions,   a  mother
               challenged the application of the benefit cap to her UC award. The benefit cap
               was applied despite the fact that she met the exemption by working the 16
               hours per  week  at  national  minimum  wage.  The  issue  was,  as  described  in
               paragraph  2.80  above,  she  was  paid  four-weekly  rather  than  monthly.  The

          171  Ibid, para 83.
          172  The Universal Credit (Earned Income) Amendment Regulations 2020 (2020/1138) came into force
          on  16  November  2020.  The  amending  regulations  make  changes  to  regulation  61  of  the  Universal
          Credit  Regulations  2013,  which  govern  how  the  Secretary  of  State  calculates  earned  income.  The
          Johnson issue is addressed by creating a power for the Secretary of State to treat one of two wage
          payments  received/reported  in  the  same  assessment  period  as  earnings  in  respect  of  a  different
          assessment period (regulation 61(6)). This only applies to claimants who are paid on a regular monthly
          basis.
          173  The benefits cap limits the total amount of income a household can receive. There is an exemption
          for claimants who are in work and, between them and their partner are earning the equivalent of 16
          hours per week on national minimum wage if receiving Universal Credit.
          174  [2020] EWHC 1944 (Admin).


          55
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69