Page 72 - Reforming Benefits Decision-Making
P. 72

2.96  Robust quality control and oversight systems that are able to identify systemic
               issues, understand why they are occurring and provide the insight required to
               fix  them  are  crucial  to  improving  DWP  decision-making,  as  is  training  to
               ensure that decision-makers are aware of their legal obligations, guidance and
               best practice. In order for quality control systems to be robust there needs to
               be  a  clear  and  measurable  set  of  performance  standards,  which,  as  the
               Equality  and  Human  Rights  Commission  (EHRC)  has  pointed  out,  are
                               199
               currently  lacking.   Such  standards  should  be  published  so  that  claimants
               know what they can expect from the DWP and it can be subject to external
               scrutiny.


          2.97  We  agree with the  Select  Committee,  EHRC  and others  that the  DWP
               should  establish  and  implement  suitable  performance  measures  which
               should be made publicly available and accompanied by clear targets to
               help ensure that the welfare system is transparent and accountable. The
               DWP  should  also  commission  an  independent  evaluation  of  its  current
               monitoring and quality assurance systems and processes and adopt any
               recommendations  made  for  improvement  in  order  to  ensure  that  such
               performance measures and targets are met (or indeed that current policy
               and guidance is being properly followed).


          Independent regulator

          2.98  Performance indicators alone are, however, insufficient. In our view there is
               also a need for formal independent oversight of DWP decision-making. It is
               the biggest Government department in terms of staff and expenditure,  yet it
                                                                             200
               is  currently  not  subject  to  any  external  oversight,  other  than  the  National
               Audit Office, whose remit is spending and value for money.  Although there
                                                                    201

          199   EHRC,  ‘Briefing note  for  the Work  and Pensions  Select  Committee:  Using  service  standards to
          improve the social security system’ (WSN0124, 2019).
          200   B.  Guerin,  ‘Civil  service  staff  numbers’  (Institute  for  Government,  May  2021);  Institute  for
          Government, ‘Departmental budgets’ (March 2020).
          201   As  noted  above  there  was  previously  independent  reviewers  for  WCAs  and  PIP  assessments.
          However, these were time limited roles (the last WCA review was in 2014 and the last PIP assessment
          review was in 2017) and confined only to health and disability assessments (see n. 13 and n.14 above).
          In Northern Ireland there have also been two independent reviews into the PIP assessment process in

          63
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77