Page 100 - JUSTICE Tackling Racial Injustice - Children and the Youth Justice System
P. 100

inappropriate, and exacerbates  BAME individuals’  frequent experiences of
               bias.

         4.55  In 2019, the average sentence length for a BAME individual was 27.1 months,
               compared to 19.5 for their White counterpart. While the reasons for this
               disparity are complex, 274  it indicates that greater scrutiny must be afforded to
               how sentences are determined. Indeed, the Lammy Review found that juries,
               by contrast, “deliver equitable results, regardless of the ethnic make-up of the
               jury, or of the defendant in question”, pursuant to “successive studies”.   275
               While we welcome initiatives such as the Equal Treatment Bench Book, 276  we
               remain concerned that such bias may continue to affect decision-making when
               it comes to BAME children.

         4.56  Unfortunately, we lack the data  to understand  biased decision-making in
               greater depth. With better data, we would be able to understand whether, and
               how, bias permeates decisions in all court centres, or whether it is located in
               specific  court  centres,  or  even  with  specific  judges  or  magistrates.  This
               knowledge is vital in order to understand and develop ways to ensure judicial
               decisions are not biased. We understand that the data which academics require
               to better understand bias in decision-making does exist but the MoJ is reluctant
               to share it either publicly or with researchers, citing concerns about being able
               to track data to specific sentencers. This reasoning is maintained, even where
               researchers undertake to keep confidential and anonymised the data. This is
               disappointing. While the independence of the judiciary is critical, it should not
               inhibit scrutiny of potential bias in decision making. It is baffling that the MoJ
               does not itself want to understand this data. We therefore recommend that


         274  “The higher conviction ratio might be partly explained by the higher rate of ‘guilty’ pleading among
         White defendants. If we look at defendants in Crown Court trials in 2019, 37% of defendants from
         BAME groups pleaded ‘not guilty’ compared with 27% of White defendants. The Lammy Review
         explained that willingness to plead guilty is linked to trust in the fairness of the legal system.” – See also
         B. Yasin and G. Sturge, Ethnicity and the criminal justice system: What does recent data say on over-
         representation?, House of Commons Library, (October 2020).
         275  See the Lammy Review, page 6, and Thomas, C. Ministry of Justice Research Series. Are Juries
         Fair? (2010), and Thomas, C. Criminal Law Review, number 9. ‘Ethnicity and the Fairness of Jury
         Trials in England and Wales 2006-2014’, (2017).
         276  “The Equal Treatment Bench Book aims to increase awareness and understanding of the different
         circumstances of people appearing in courts and tribunals. It helps enable effective communication and
         suggests steps which should increase participation by all parties.” – see Equal Treatment Bench Book,
         March 2020.


         93
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105