Page 101 - JUSTICE Tackling Racial Injustice - Children and the Youth Justice System
P. 101

the MoJ engages with academics who research sentencing data and share
               the necessary data with researchers to  measure  bias within judicial
               decision-making.


         4.57  We  understand  that  the  Magistrates’  Association  has  set  racial
               disproportionality in the YJS as a policy priority, 277  and intends to introduce
               training on this issue, as well as to continue to provide resources to its members
               to raise awareness of the issue.

         4.58  The initiatives we propose in Chapter 3 would aim to reduce such bias in
               decision making.  Moreover, evidence shows that peer-review encourages
               individuals  to check their own work and decision-making. 278   This  is the
               approach that the courts in the State of New York have taken.  The  courts
               commissioned an internal review and allowed judges, clerks, court watchers,
               court officers and  lawyers to be interviewed on the  topic and for
               recommendations to be made. 279  We see no reason why such a review could
               not take place within our own court estate, and the Courts of England and
               Wales should establish internal peer-review initiatives to increase scrutiny
               of judicial decisions.

         4.59  The  CPS has  also established good  practice  in  both  internal  and  external
               scrutiny, as highlighted by the Lammy Review. Internal scrutiny includes a
               systematic review of charging decisions, with each prosecutor also having at
               least one randomly selected case reviewed  each month. These reviews are
               undertaken by the prosecutor’s line manager. Despite this practice, we note
               that  improvements  can  still be made, particularly  in  the  YJS.  In  a  recent
               inspection, HM Crown Prosecution Inspectorate found that the CPS’s youth
               charging policy was fully or partially applied in only 68% of cases, and not
               applied at all  in 32% of cases. 280   Moreover,  the CPS’s internal scrutiny


         277  M. Gammon and J. Easton, ‘Disproportionality in the Youth Justice System’ Magistrates Association,
         2019.
         278   H. Park and J.  Blenkinsopp,  ‘The  roles of  transparency and  trust in  the relationship between
         corruption and citizen satisfaction’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 77(2) 254-274,
         (2011).

         279  J. Johnson, Report from the Special Adviser on Equal Justice in the New York State Courts, October
         2020.
         280  HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate, 2020 Charging Inspection: a thematic review of the
         quality and timeliness of charging decisions, (September 2020), p. 14.


                                                                                  94
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106