Page 99 - JUSTICE Tackling Racial Injustice - Children and the Youth Justice System
P. 99

4.51  We recognise that in  addition to  CSPs, police forces have internal review
               mechanisms to investigate allegations  of wrongdoing. The  College of
               Policing’s  Authorised  Professional  Practice  recommends that supervising
               officers examine emerging trends. However, these scrutiny mechanisms vary
               from force to force. In the BTP, for example, a sergeant assesses every stop
               and search undertaken, and conducts randomised reviews of historic searches
               on a regular basis. Moreover, all stop forms include details on ethnicity.
               Internal scrutiny  should identify whether  an officer is regularly stopping
               people without reasonable grounds, and prompt further action in the form of
               training to improve their use of the power.


         Bias in decision-making
         4.52  After a case is determined at court, if the defendant is unhappy with  their
               conviction, or the  length of their sentence,  they can, under certain
               circumstances, lodge an appeal. This process helps to ensure the decisions of
               judges are scrutinised and held to account through a forensic analysis of the
               law and facts.

         4.53  Appeals are an essential part of the CJS. However, they require legal
               representation (with costs or Legal Aid), time and energy. They also mean that
               the fate of the individual appealing remains uncertain until the appeal is
               concluded. Where the sentence is short or where someone is a repeat offender,
               the value of an appeal reduces, regardless of the strength of the case. In turn,
               judicial  accountability  (and  the  development  of  best  practice)  fades  away.
               Moreover, even where a defendant is successful in their appeal, it is rare that
               issues of racial bias are ventilated.


         4.54  Another block to accountability is the discretionary nature of many judicial
               decisions. For example, provided that a judge or magistrate makes a decision
               that is within the range of sentencing guidelines and is not explicitly racist, it
               is  unlikely  that an appeal  based  on  bias  will  be  successful.  Although the
               research is patchy, there have been worrying reports and anecdotal examples
               of racial bias. 273  We heard one striking example from a child, who a judge
               referred to as a “strapping Black lad.” Such language is clearly alienating,



         273  O. Bowcott, ‘Judges told they should consider previous racial bias before sentencing’ The Guardian,
         9 December 2021.


                                                                                  92
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104